Case Study 2 — Jordan's Slump and the Protocol That Broke It

A worked turnaround, done right — the slump-recovery protocol applied step by step, with the activity math shown. All people are composites used to teach; numbers are illustrative.


The Setup

Fast-forward five months from the dark Friday bullpen in the chapter hook. Jordan Banks survived the first 90 days — barely — and got good. By month five Jordan was a steady producer: about 14 cars a month, a growing CRM, a real follow-up habit, the beginnings of a few referrals. Big Mike at the desk had stopped worrying about the green pea.

Then month six happened.

Week one: two deals that were "done" fell out in finance (one couldn't get bought, one's co-signer backed out). Week two: a stretch of slow, lukewarm traffic — lots of "just looking," nobody ready. By the end of week two, Jordan had sold two cars against a normal pace of ~3–4 a week, and the dark voice from the first Friday was back, louder now and with more ammunition: "You peaked. You got lucky for a few months and now it's over. You've lost it."

Here's where Jordan's story diverges from Rick's. Jordan went to Carmen — and Carmen, instead of a pep talk, walked Jordan through the protocol.


What Happens — The Protocol, Step by Step

Step 1 — Name it (normal, temporary, common)

Carmen didn't say "you're fine." She said: "Say it out loud. 'I'm in a slump.'"

Jordan, reluctantly: "I'm in a slump."

"Now the rest of it: It's normal. It happens to everyone, including me. It's temporary, and it's fixable."

Jordan repeated it, feeling slightly ridiculous and slightly better. Carmen nodded. "It feels dumb. It's load-bearing. You just stopped that voice from turning two slow weeks into 'I've lost it forever.' That story is the actual enemy, not the two weeks."

Why it worked: naming the slump as a normal, temporary, common event blocked the stage-2 rumination (§6.3) from globalizing a two-week variance into a permanent verdict.

Step 2 — Audit the activity (CRM, not memory)

"Now," Carmen said, "you feel like you're doing everything the same. Let's not trust the feeling. Pull your actual numbers — last two weeks against a good month."

Jordan pulled the CRM. Here's what it showed:

Activity (per week) Good month (baseline) Last 2 weeks (the slump)
Ups taken ~18 ~16
Follow-up calls/texts ~60 ~32
Past-customer touches ~10 ~3
Needs analyses done ~14 ~12
CRM logged same-day always slipping

Jordan stared at it. "I... my follow-up calls are almost cut in half. And I barely touched past customers."

"There it is," Carmen said. "You swore you were doing everything the same. You weren't. When the deals stopped feeling good, you quietly pulled back on the boring stuff — the follow-up, the past-customer calls, the logging. Not on purpose. But that's exactly the activity that fills next week's funnel. The slump isn't mysterious. You stopped feeding the machine."

Why it worked: the audit revealed the truth the feeling hid — this was an activity slump in disguise (§6.3), not a lost "touch." Nine times out of ten, that's what the CRM shows. And it's good news: activity is the one thing fully in Jordan's control to fix.

Step 3 — Flood the funnel (more, not less)

"Here's the counterintuitive part," Carmen said. "You're tired and discouraged, so every instinct says do less. We're going to do more — for two weeks, a sprint. Not your normal numbers. Above them."

The sprint plan:

Activity Sprint target (2 weeks)
Take every up — no pre-judging 100%
Follow-up calls/texts 80/week (above the 60 baseline)
Past-customer touches 15/week (back from 3)
Work the sphere-of-influence list (Ch 17) 5/day
Log everything same-day every time

"Two reasons we go above baseline," Carmen said. "One, math — more at-bats means more hits, even at a depressed close rate. Two, and bigger: action is the cure for the feeling. You can't think your way calm. You behave your way calm. The confidence comes back after you start doing the work, not before. Don't wait to feel like it. Just do the calls."

Step 4 — One outside fix (second set of eyes)

"Last thing for today," Carmen said. "I'm going to watch you with your next two ups, and I'm going to tell you one thing — not ten — that I see."

She watched. Her one note: "You've started reaching for numbers about four minutes too early. When you got nervous about the slump, you started rushing to the close to 'make' a sale — which makes customers feel handled, so they pull back, so you sell less. Slow back down. Stay in the needs analysis. Let it breathe."

One fixable thing. Jordan could feel it was true the moment Carmen said it.

Step 5 — Re-ground in fundamentals

"Don't get fancy or desperate," Carmen said. "No new gimmicks. Go back to exactly what built your good months — warm greeting, real needs analysis, honest presentation, clean follow-up. The fundamentals didn't quit on you. You got rattled and started rushing them. Re-ground."

Step 6 — Protect the body

"And go to bed," Carmen added. "You look exhausted. Two nights of real sleep and you'll have twenty percent more energy on the floor, and customers feel that. Half of what looks like a sales slump is a sleep problem wearing a costume."


The Result — The Numbers

Jordan ran the protocol. Here's the two-week sprint against the slump:

Week Follow-up calls Past-cust. touches Ups Cars sold
Slump wk 1 ~32 ~3 16 1
Slump wk 2 ~32 ~3 16 1
Sprint wk 1 81 16 18 3
Sprint wk 2 84 15 19 4

What actually happened in the sprint: - Two of the past-customer touches turned into a trade-up and a referral — business that simply wasn't there when Jordan had stopped making those calls. - The flood of follow-up reactivated two "not nows" from earlier in the month who were now ready. - Slowing the needs analysis back down (Carmen's one fix) recovered Jordan's close rate on fresh ups.

By the end of the sprint, the slump was over — and Jordan had banked the lesson that mattered more than the four cars: the slump was an activity drop, the CRM proved it, and the cure was doing more, not less.


Analysis — Why This Worked Where Rick Failed

Put Jordan's month six next to Rick's whole year (Case Study 1) and the contrast is the whole chapter:

Rick (Case 1) Jordan (Case 2)
Diagnosed the slump? No — "slow traffic" Yes — CRM audit found the activity drop
Reaction to discouragement Did less (withdrew) Did more (flooded the funnel)
Got outside eyes? No Yes — one fix from Carmen
Protected the body? No (5 hrs sleep) Yes (Step 6)
Outcome Spiral → quit Spiral broken in 2 weeks

The deciding factor was not talent — Jordan is less naturally gifted than Rick. It was the protocol: a pre-decided set of steps run at the exact moment Jordan was least able to think clearly, so the thinking was already done in advance. That's the entire point of having a written slump protocol in your Resilience Plan (the Chapter 6 portfolio component) — you write it on a good day so you can run it on a bad one.

There's also a quieter win here, tied to §6.2 and §6.7: because Jordan's daily sense of "doing fine" was being re-anchored to activity (the calls, the touches) rather than to the scoreboard, the slump couldn't keep its grip. Every day Jordan hit the sprint numbers was a win — a real, controllable victory — even before the cars came back. That stream of small wins is what carried Jordan through the two weeks without spiraling the way Rick did.


Discussion Questions

  1. Jordan "swore" the activity was the same, but the CRM showed follow-up calls nearly halved. Why is this gap between felt activity and actual activity so common in a slump — and what does it tell you about relying on memory vs. data (Step 2)?
  2. Carmen gave Jordan exactly one fix, not a list. Using the chapter, explain why "one fixable thing" beats a comprehensive critique when someone is already discouraged.
  3. The sprint set activity above baseline, not at it. Make the case for why that's correct even though Jordan was tired — and where the line is between "flood the funnel" (Step 3) and "protect the body" (Step 6).
  4. Two of Jordan's sprint sales came from past-customer touches that had dropped to near zero during the slump. Connect this to theme #4 ("follow-up is the business") and to why Rick's no-base model (Case 1) made his slumps unrecoverable.
  5. Suppose Jordan's CRM audit had shown activity was genuinely steady during the slow weeks. Which protocol steps still apply, and how would the diagnosis change?

Your Turn (mini-task)

Write your own version of the Step 2 audit table for your store: list the 4–6 activities you'd track (ups, follow-up calls, past-customer touches, needs analyses, CRM logging, plus anything specific to your store), and write down your honest good-month baseline number for each. Keep this table in your Resilience Plan — on a bad day, you'll fill in the "last 2 weeks" column and let the data tell you the truth before the dark voice does.