Self-Assessment Quiz: Direct Proof and Contraposition

Twenty questions to check your grip on definitions, the two strategies, and the mistake catalog. Answer each from memory before opening the key. Aim for 16+.


Question 1

A proof of a universally quantified statement differs from testing because:

A) a proof checks more cases than any test suite B) a proof establishes the statement for every case at once, with no input left unchecked C) a proof is faster to write than a test D) a proof only needs to handle the cases the tests missed

Question 2

By the chapter's definition, an integer $n$ is even iff:

A) $n$ is divisible by 4 B) $n / 2$ is a number C) there exists an integer $k$ with $n = 2k$ D) $n$ is not odd, by assumption

Question 3

The statement "$a \mid b$" means:

A) the number $a / b$ B) there exists an integer $c$ with $b = ac$ (and $a \neq 0$) C) $a$ is less than or equal to $b$ D) the remainder of $b \div a$ is nonzero

Question 4

"$3 \mid 12 = 4$" is best described as:

A) a true statement B) a correct computation C) a type error — it equates a true/false statement with a number D) the definition of divisibility

Question 5

In a direct proof of $P \rightarrow Q$, you:

A) assume $\neg Q$ and derive $\neg P$ B) assume $P$ and derive $Q$ C) assume $\neg(P \rightarrow Q)$ and derive a contradiction D) check $P \rightarrow Q$ for several values

Question 6

The contrapositive of "if $P$ then $Q$" is:

A) if $Q$ then $P$ B) if $\neg P$ then $\neg Q$ C) if $\neg Q$ then $\neg P$ D) if $P$ then $\neg Q$

Question 7

The converse of "if $P$ then $Q$" is:

A) logically equivalent to the original B) "if $Q$ then $P$," and not logically equivalent to the original C) "if $\neg Q$ then $\neg P$" D) always false

Question 8

You want to prove "for every integer $n$, if $n^2$ is odd then $n$ is odd." The recommended strategy is:

A) a direct proof, by taking a square root B) proof by contraposition, because the direct attack can't extract $n$ from $n^2$ C) proof by example, checking $n = 1, 3, 5$ D) a vacuous proof

Question 9

The contrapositive of "$\forall x,\ P(x) \rightarrow Q(x)$" is:

A) $\exists x,\ \neg Q(x) \rightarrow \neg P(x)$ B) $\forall x,\ \neg Q(x) \rightarrow \neg P(x)$ C) $\forall x,\ Q(x) \rightarrow P(x)$ D) $\exists x,\ \neg P(x) \land \neg Q(x)$

Question 10

A vacuous proof of $P \rightarrow Q$ works by showing:

A) $Q$ is always true B) $P$ is always false C) both $P$ and $Q$ are true D) $P$ and $Q$ are equivalent

Question 11

A trivial proof of $P \rightarrow Q$ works by showing:

A) $Q$ is always true, without using $P$ B) $P$ is always false C) $P$ implies $\neg Q$ D) the statement is a tautology of Chapter 1

Question 12

Writing $a = 2k$ and $b = 2k$ to represent two arbitrary even integers is a mistake because:

A) $2k$ is not always even B) it secretly forces $a = b$ C) $k$ might not be an integer D) you should use $2k + 1$ instead

Question 13

Which is a complete proof of "there exists an integer $x$ with $x^2 = 49$"?

A) checking $x = 1, 2, 3$ and seeing a pattern B) exhibiting $x = 7$, since $7^2 = 49$ C) assuming no such $x$ exists and deriving a contradiction only D) none — you can never prove an existential with one example

Question 14

Which biconditional was assembled in §4.3–4.4 from a direct proof (forward) and a contraposition (reverse)?

A) $n$ is even iff $n$ is divisible by 4 B) $n$ is odd iff $n^2$ is odd C) $a \mid b$ iff $b \mid a$ D) $a + b$ is even iff $a = b$

Question 15

To prove a biconditional $P \leftrightarrow Q$, you must:

A) prove only $P \rightarrow Q$ B) prove only the contrapositive C) prove both $P \rightarrow Q$ and $Q \rightarrow P$ D) build a truth table

Question 16 (True/False, justify)

True or false: If a program's correctness claim has a precondition that excludes a given input, then the claim is (vacuously) satisfied on that input. Justify in one sentence.

Question 17 (True/False, justify)

True or false: A conditional and its converse are logically equivalent. Justify in one sentence, with an everyday example.

Question 18 (True/False, justify)

True or false: Verifying the Goldbach conjecture by computer past $10^{18}$ makes it a theorem. Justify in one sentence.

Question 19 (Short answer)

In the master habit of this chapter, what are the three moves — in order — that take you from a hypothesis like "$n$ is odd" to a conclusion like "$n^2$ is odd"?

Question 20 (Short answer)

When a proof states no strategy, name the three opening moves that tell you whether it is a direct proof, a proof by contraposition, or (Chapter 5) a proof by contradiction.


Answer Key

Q Ans Note
1 B A proof covers all cases at once; testing samples finitely many.
2 C Even is an existential: $\exists k \in \mathbb{Z},\ n = 2k$.
3 B Divides is existential: $\exists c \in \mathbb{Z},\ b = ac$, with $a \neq 0$.
4 C $a \mid b$ is a statement (true/false); $a / b$ is a number. Equating them is a type error.
5 B Direct proof: assume the hypothesis $P$, derive the conclusion $Q$.
6 C Contrapositive = swap and negate both: $\neg Q \rightarrow \neg P$.
7 B Converse = swap only ($Q \rightarrow P$); not equivalent to the original.
8 B Contraposition turns it into "if $n$ even then $n^2$ even," which is easy.
9 B The $\forall$ stays; you negate the parts of the inner conditional.
10 B Hypothesis always false ⇒ the conditional is vacuously true.
11 A Conclusion always true (no use of $P$) ⇒ trivially true.
12 B Same name forces the two quantities equal; use fresh names $2j$, $2k$.
13 B One witness is a full proof of an existential.
14 B "$n$ odd iff $n^2$ odd": forward = Example 1, reverse = Example 4.
15 C A biconditional is two conditionals; prove both directions.
16 True A conditional with a false hypothesis is true — the precondition failing makes the guarantee vacuous (§4.5).
17 False Converse swaps without negating; "rain ⇒ wet ground" does not give "wet ground ⇒ rain" (a sprinkler also wets it).
18 False No finite verification covers all even integers; it remains a conjecture until proved.
19 Unpack the hypothesis into an equation ($n = 2k+1$), do the algebra, then repackage into the goal's definition ($n^2 = 2m+1$).
20 Direct: the author assumes $P$. Contrapositive: the author assumes $\neg Q$. Contradiction: the author assumes the negation of the whole claim.

Topics to review by question

Questions Topic
1, 18 What a proof is vs. testing (§4.1; theme two)
2, 3, 4 The definitions of even, odd, and divides (§4.2)
5, 19 The direct-proof strategy and the unpack/repackage habit (§4.3)
6, 7, 8, 9, 17 Contrapositive vs. converse; when to contrapose (§4.4)
10, 11, 16 Vacuous and trivial proofs (§4.5)
12, 21–style pitfalls The mistake catalog (§4.5)
13 Existential claims need one witness, not arbitrariness (§4.5)
14, 15 Biconditionals proved in both directions (§4.3–4.4)
20 Reading a proof critically: identifying the strategy (§4.6)