Appendix E — Documentation Checklists by Borrower Type
Working lists, organized by who the borrower is and where the money comes from. For every item: what it is, why the underwriter wants it, and what commonly goes wrong. The third column is the one that saves files.
⚠️ Before you hand any of this to a borrower. Documentation requirements are set by the agency and the investor, not by statute — Fannie Mae's Selling Guide, Freddie Mac's Seller/Servicer Guide, HUD Handbook 4000.1, the VA Lender's Handbook, USDA HB-1-3555 — and then tightened by your lender's overlays. They differ by program and they change. Every period in this appendix is stated as "commonly", which means: verify against the current guide and your compliance department before you promise anything. What the automated underwriting system returns on a specific file governs that file, and it can ask for less than these lists or more.
E.1 How to use these lists
The two questions that decide whether a document works.
- Does it prove the thing, or merely mention it? A borrower's letter saying "the \$10,000 was a gift from my parents" mentions the gift. The donor's signed gift letter plus evidence of the transfer proves it. Underwriters do not condition files because they doubt the borrower. They condition files because the file must survive being read by someone who has never met the borrower — an auditor, an investor, a repurchase reviewer three years from now (§28, §34).
- Is it complete, legible, and current? Most conditions are re-issued not because the document was wrong but because page 3 of 4 was missing, the scan cut off the account number, or the statement was from the wrong month.
The four failure modes, in order of frequency:
1. INCOMPLETE " all pages " means all pages, including the blank one
that says " this page intentionally left blank "
2. STALE the document was fine when collected and is not fine now
3. INCONSISTENT the address, the name spelling, the employer, or the
income does not match another document in the same file
4. UNSOURCED the money is there and nobody can say where it came from
Collect once, collect completely, collect early. The Linden Street file cleared nine prior-to-document conditions between day 29 and day 33 — five calendar days, three business days — and then nothing happened for eleven days. That dead window, not the document collection, is what cost the file its closing date (§6, §19). Documents are not the bottleneck. Waiting to ask for them is.
The name-matching rule. Every document should carry the borrower's name the way it will appear on the note. A W-2 with a maiden name, a bank statement with a middle initial that the application omits, and a purchase contract with a nickname are three separate conditions, and each takes a day. Fix name variations at application, not at underwriting.
E.2 Every borrower — the universal set
Collected on every file regardless of income type, program, or transaction.
| Document | What it is / why the underwriter wants it | What commonly goes wrong |
|---|---|---|
| Government photo identification | Unexpired driver's license, state ID, passport, or permanent resident card. Identity verification, name matching to the note, and it supports the institution's customer identification obligations (§27) | Expired. A license that expires between application and closing must be renewed. Name on the ID does not match the application. A borrower who has moved and never updated the address |
| Social Security number | Supports the credit pull and identity verification; some programs require validation | Transposed digits — which produce a credit file that is not the borrower's, and a delay measured in days |
| The application (URLA), signed and dated | The Uniform Residential Loan Application. The borrower's own statement of income, assets, debts, and intent, made under a certification that it is true | Signed but not dated. A page missing. Declarations answered "no" that the credit report contradicts. Occupancy answered casually — this is the field that turns a mistake into occupancy fraud (§27) |
| The initial disclosure package, signed and returned | Loan Estimate acknowledgment, intent to proceed, and the required disclosures (§22, and Appendix D §D.5) | Returned unsigned; returned by only one of two borrowers; the intent to proceed never recorded, which freezes fee collection |
| Borrower's authorization | Permission to verify employment, income, assets, and to obtain a consumer report. Supports FCRA permissible purpose (§10, Appendix D §D.12) | Undated, or so old the verifying party refuses it. Some verifiers require their own form |
| IRS Form 4506-C | The lender's request for tax transcripts through the IRS Income Verification Express Service. It lets the underwriter compare what the borrower gave you against what the borrower gave the IRS | Wrong form version — the IRS changes it, and an outdated version is rejected outright. Name, address, or SSN not matching the return as filed (a borrower who has moved must use the address on the return). Wrong tax form type or wrong years checked. Missing signature from both borrowers |
| Letter of explanation, as conditioned | Written explanation of an inquiry, a late payment, a gap in employment, an address discrepancy, a large deposit | Vague. "I don't remember" is not an explanation. The letter contradicts a document elsewhere in the file. Best practice: the loan officer drafts nothing and edits nothing — the borrower writes it, in their own words, and you check it against the file before it goes up |
| Verification of rent or mortgage history | Twelve months of cancelled checks, bank debits, or a verification from a management company. Establishes payment habit where credit is thin, and supports the payment-shock analysis | A verification from a private landlord who is a relative — commonly requires cancelled checks or bank evidence instead. Rent paid in cash, which cannot be documented |
| Divorce decree / separation agreement, if applicable | Establishes obligations, awards, property division, and whether income or a debt belongs to this borrower | The decree assigns a debt to the ex-spouse but the borrower is still on the note — the credit obligation usually still counts unless the program's specific exclusion conditions are met |
| Bankruptcy or foreclosure documentation, if applicable | Discharge papers, schedules, the final settlement statement. Establishes the seasoning clock, which differs by program | The borrower reports the filing date and the guide runs from the discharge date. Missing schedules, which is where the mortgage debt appears |
⚠️ The 4506-C is the quiet one. It is a routine signature at application and one of the most common causes of late-file surprises, because the transcripts come back late and disagree with the returns the borrower handed you. If a borrower hesitates at the 4506-C, find out why on day one, not on day thirty-three.
E.3 W-2 salaried
The simplest file, which is why the errors in it are usually errors of assumption.
| Document | Why the underwriter wants it | What commonly goes wrong |
|---|---|---|
| Paystubs — commonly the most recent 30 days, showing year-to-date earnings, for each borrower | Proves current employment and current pay rate; the YTD figure lets the underwriter reconcile the annualized salary against the W-2s | Only one stub when the borrower is paid weekly (30 days is four or five stubs, not one). A stub with no YTD. A stub with no employer name. A borrower who took a new job mid-year and whose YTD does not annualize |
| W-2 forms — commonly the two most recent years, all employers | Establishes history and lets the underwriter see whether income is stable, rising, or falling; catches employment the borrower forgot to list | The borrower supplies the state copy, which omits fields. A second employer's W-2 is missing, which raises a question about undisclosed employment |
| Written or verbal verification of employment | Confirms position, dates, and pay directly with the employer. The verbal VOE is a pre-funding check that the borrower is still employed on the note date | The employer uses a third-party verification service that charges, or refuses to speak by phone. HR is closed the week of closing. A borrower who has told nobody at work that they are buying a home |
| Employment gap explanation, if more than the guide's tolerance | Two years of history is the common standard; gaps must be explained and, for extended gaps, the borrower may need time back at work | A borrower who was in school and does not think to say so — a transcript or diploma often resolves it |
| Offer letter / employment contract, if starting a new job | Some programs permit qualifying on a not-yet-started job under narrow conditions | Assuming it is allowed. The conditions are narrow and program-specific — verify |
⚠️ A salary is not automatically a stable salary. A borrower who changed employers three times in two years within the same field is usually fine; one who changed fields may not be. Ask about the history at application, not after the underwriter does.
E.4 Hourly
Everything in §E.3, plus the arithmetic problem hourly pay creates.
| Document | Why the underwriter wants it | What commonly goes wrong |
|---|---|---|
| Paystubs showing the hourly rate and hours paid | Qualifying income is generally rate × guaranteed hours ÷ 12, not the annualized YTD, when hours vary | The stub shows total pay but not hours, so the underwriter cannot separate base from variable |
| Verification of guaranteed hours | The difference between a 40-hour employee and a "usually about 40" employee is the difference between base income and variable income | The employer's VOE says "varies," which converts the whole income to variable and triggers a 24-month averaging requirement |
| Two years of W-2s | Lets the underwriter average variable hours across a full cycle | A borrower whose hours were cut last year and restored this year — the average is lower than the current reality, and there is usually no relief |
The Linden Street base-income calculation is the standard hourly build:
| Step | Arithmetic | Result |
|---|---|---|
| Hourly rate | documented on the paystub and VOE | \$33.00 |
| Annualized | \$33.00 × 2,080 hours | \$68,640.00 | |
| Monthly base | ÷ 12 | \$5,720.00 |
2,080 is 40 hours × 52 weeks. It is a convention, and it only applies when the hours are guaranteed. If they are not, the income is variable and §E.5 governs.
E.5 Overtime, bonus, and shift differential
This is where W-2 files go wrong, because the borrower thinks of this money as income and the guide thinks of it as probably.
| Document | Why the underwriter wants it | What commonly goes wrong |
|---|---|---|
| Paystubs with a YTD breakout by earnings code — base, overtime, shift differential, bonus, each on its own line | The 24-month average cannot be built if base and variable are lumped into one "gross" figure | The payroll system prints only "gross earnings." The fix is a written VOE with the breakout, or an employer letter — and it takes days |
| Two years of W-2s | Supplies the two prior-year totals for the average | The W-2 does not break out overtime either; the W-2 gives the total, the stubs give the composition, and you need both |
| Written VOE addressing continuance | Programs commonly require a reasonable expectation that the variable income continues | The employer's VOE says the overtime is "not guaranteed," which is true of all overtime and can still be fatal if the underwriter reads it as a statement that it is ending |
| Explanation of any decline | Variable income that is falling is generally averaged over the longer period or reduced to the current lower level | The borrower argues that this year is better; the file's own documents disagree |
The Linden Street worked example — Borrower 1, registered nurse, three years at a regional hospital:
| Year | Shift differential + overtime |
|---|---|
| Prior year | \$6,720 |
| Most recent year | \$7,200 |
| Total | \$13,920 |
| ÷ 24 months | \$580.00 per month |
\$580.00 is the qualifying figure. Note what the arithmetic does and does not do: it does not reward the borrower for the better recent year, and it does not punish them for the weaker one. Averaging over 24 months is a deliberate conservatism, and it is the same conservatism that costs Borrower 2 money in §E.6.
⚠️ What breaks this calculation in practice is not the math — it is the document. If the paystubs do not break out the differential separately, the underwriter cannot build \$580.00 and will either count nothing or send a condition. On a file with 42.66% back-end and no room, losing \$580.00 of income is losing the loan. Ask for a stub with earnings codes at the discovery call (§9, §14).
E.6 Commissioned
| Document | Why the underwriter wants it | What commonly goes wrong |
|---|---|---|
| Paystubs, most recent 30 days, with YTD | Same as above, plus the reconciliation of gross commission to net deposits | Commission that is paid on a different cycle from base pay, so a 30-day window catches base and no commission at all |
| Two years of W-2s | The two annual commission totals that build the average | The W-2 combines base and commission into Box 1, so the split must come from the stubs or the VOE |
| Written VOE breaking out base from commission, with a statement of continuance | Establishes the split and the probability of continuance — this is Condition 3 on the Linden Street file | Employers dislike predicting continuance. Build the request precisely so the employer can answer it factually |
| Most recent commission statement | Ties a specific payment to a specific period — and this is the document that sources the deposit | The statement is issued by a sales portal rather than payroll and does not carry the employer's name |
| Two years of personal tax returns, when commission exceeds the guide's threshold of total income, or when unreimbursed business expenses exist | Where a commissioned borrower deducts unreimbursed expenses, the guide may require them to be subtracted from qualifying income. The treatment has changed with tax law — verify | The borrower does not mention Schedule A or Form 2106 deductions. The transcripts reveal them later |
The Linden Street worked example — Borrower 2, outside sales, four years, W-2 base plus commission:
| Base salary | \$28,800.00 per year ÷ 12 = **\$2,400.00** per month |
| Commission, prior year | \$19,800 |
| Commission, most recent year | \$23,400 |
| Two-year total | \$43,200 |
| ÷ 24 months | \$1,800.00 per month |
Now read the same figures the way the borrower reads them. The trend is rising: +18.18%. The most recent year alone would give \$23,400 ÷ 12 = **\$1,950.00 per month. The conservative 24-month rule therefore costs this borrower \$150.00 per month** of qualifying income — roughly 60 basis points of back-end ratio on this file.
⚠️ Explain this at application, not at approval. A borrower whose income is rising and who is qualified on a two-year average feels cheated, and the feeling arrives at exactly the moment you need their cooperation on conditions. Say it on day one: "Your commission is going up, and the guideline is going to average two years anyway. That's the number we work with." (§9, §14)
Two structural facts about commission that drive everything else in the file:
- Commission is often paid on a different cycle from salary — monthly, quarterly, or annually. On this file it is quarterly.
- Quarterly commission is lumpy, which means the borrower's bank statements will show large, irregular deposits. That is normal, it is not a red flag, and it is the direct cause of the sourcing condition in §E.12.
E.7 Self-employed — the common core
Who is self-employed, for documentation purposes: commonly, a borrower with 25% or more ownership in a business. Verify the current threshold and the definition with the guide — it governs whether the borrower's income comes from a W-2 or from a cash flow analysis, and it is not the borrower's choice.
The core set, all entity types:
| Document | Why the underwriter wants it | What commonly goes wrong |
|---|---|---|
| Two years of personal federal tax returns, all pages and all schedules, signed | The borrower's actual, filed income — the starting point for every cash flow analysis | Missing schedules. Unsigned. The borrower supplies the accountant's draft rather than the filed copy. Extensions filed and returns not yet complete |
| Two years of business federal tax returns, all pages and all schedules (entity-specific — see below), signed | Establishes business income, distributions, and the add-backs and deductions the analysis relies on | Same failures, plus a fiscal year that does not match the calendar year |
| Year-to-date profit and loss statement and balance sheet | Shows the business has not deteriorated since the last filed return. Audit and preparation requirements vary — verify | Prepared by the borrower in a spreadsheet with no methodology. The P&L contradicts the business bank statements |
| Evidence the business exists and is operating, verified close to the note date | Confirms the income source is still there. Commonly satisfied by a third-party source, a CPA letter, a licensing body, or a business website plus a phone listing | A single-member business with no public footprint. A CPA who will not write the letter because of professional liability standards — increasingly common, so ask early |
| Business license, or evidence of a two-year history | Establishes the length of self-employment | Length measured from incorporation rather than from the start of self-employment in the same line of work — the guide may allow a shorter history in defined circumstances; verify |
| IRS Form 4506-C for both personal and business returns | Transcripts to validate what was filed | Business transcripts are ordered on the wrong form type or the wrong entity name |
| CPA or preparer contact information | For verification and for the analysis | The borrower prepares their own returns, which is permitted but removes a verification path |
⚠️ The single most damaging conversation in self-employed lending happens before you are involved. The borrower's accountant tells them what they "make," and the accountant is answering a different question — cash in the household, before the deductions the guide adds back and after the ones it does not. On the Fulton Avenue file, the accountant said "about \$9,500 a month." The Form 1084 analysis produced \$8,916.67. Neither party was wrong; they were computing different things. Say this out loud at the first meeting (§11, §32).
E.7.1 Sole proprietorship
| Additional document | Why | What goes wrong |
|---|---|---|
| Schedule C, both years, all pages | The business is the person; Schedule C net profit is the starting figure | The borrower's income falls sharply once the deductions taken to minimize tax are respected. This is the central tension of self-employed lending and it must be named at application |
| Form 4562 (depreciation and amortization), if applicable | Depreciation and depletion are commonly added back because they did not leave the business | The borrower filed a Schedule C with a depreciation figure and no Form 4562, so the add-back cannot be documented |
| Business bank statements, as conditioned | Supports the P&L and confirms the business is operating | Personal and business funds commingled in one account, which converts a clean file into a forensic one |
What is commonly added back: depreciation, depletion, amortization, casualty losses, and the business-use-of-home deduction. What is commonly subtracted: meals and entertainment exclusions, and non-recurring income. Verify each against the current guide — the treatment of individual lines changes.
E.7.2 Partnership (and LLCs taxed as partnerships)
| Additional document | Why | What goes wrong |
|---|---|---|
| Form 1065, both years, all pages and schedules | The partnership return | Borrower supplies only the K-1 |
| Schedule K-1 (Form 1065) for this borrower, both years | Shows the borrower's ownership percentage, ordinary business income, guaranteed payments, and distributions | Ownership percentage below the self-employment threshold changes the whole analysis — read it before you build anything |
| Partnership agreement, as conditioned | Establishes access to funds and restrictions on distributions | A partner who owns 40% but has no unilateral right to withdraw funds — which matters enormously if business funds are proposed for the down payment (§E.12) |
⚠️ Distributions matter as much as income. A K-1 can report substantial income that the partner never received. Programs commonly require evidence of liquidity or of actual distributions before the income is counted. Verify.
E.7.3 S-corporation
| Additional document | Why | What goes wrong |
|---|---|---|
| Form 1120-S, both years, all pages and schedules | The corporate return | Missing Schedule L or M-1, which the analysis may use |
| Schedule K-1 (Form 1120-S) for this borrower, both years | Ownership percentage and the borrower's share of ordinary business income | Same as partnership — ownership percentage governs |
| The borrower's W-2 from their own corporation | An S-corp owner-employee pays themselves a wage; that wage is part of the qualifying income and it is easy to miss | The wage is counted and the K-1 is not, or the reverse. Both belong in the analysis |
| Evidence of ability to withdraw funds, if business funds are used | Same as partnership | A 100% owner still needs the cash flow analysis showing withdrawal will not damage the business |
The Fulton Avenue worked example — S-corporation, six-employee residential HVAC, Fannie Mae Form 1084:
| Line | Year 1 | Year 2 |
|---|---|---|
| W-2 wages paid to self | \$62,000 | \$71,000 | |
| K-1 ordinary business income | \$38,400 | \$21,600 | |
| + Depreciation | \$14,200 | \$16,800 | |
| − Meals and entertainment exclusion | (\$2,100) | (\$2,400) | |
| − Nonrecurring other income | (\$3,000) | \$0 | |
| TOTAL | \$109,500** | **\$107,000 |
| 24-month average | \$216,500 ÷ 24 = **\$9,020.83/month** |
| Most recent year alone | \$107,000 ÷ 12 = **\$8,916.67/month** |
| Year-over-year change | −2.3% — income declined |
| Qualifying income used | \$8,916.67 — the lower figure |
⚠️ Declining income inverts the averaging rule. Rising income is averaged over two years, which costs the borrower (§E.6). Declining income is not averaged — the underwriter uses the lower, more recent figure. The rule is not symmetric, it is conservative in both directions, and a borrower who understands that in advance is a borrower who does not feel ambushed (§32).
E.7.4 C-corporation
| Additional document | Why | What goes wrong |
|---|---|---|
| Form 1120, both years, all pages and schedules | The corporate return. A C-corp is a separate taxpayer — its income is not the borrower's income | |
| The borrower's W-2 from the corporation | For most C-corp owners, the W-2 wage is the qualifying income, and the corporate return exists mostly to prove the wage is sustainable | The borrower expects retained corporate earnings to count as personal income. Generally they do not unless actually distributed and documented as recurring |
| Evidence of dividends or distributions, if relied on | Must be documented, recurring, and likely to continue | A single dividend in one year is non-recurring and will not be counted |
| Percentage of ownership | Determines whether the borrower is self-employed for documentation purposes |
E.8 Retired, Social Security, disability, and other non-taxable income
| Document | Why the underwriter wants it | What commonly goes wrong |
|---|---|---|
| Award letter — Social Security, pension, disability, annuity, VA benefits | States the benefit amount and, critically, whether and when it expires | The borrower supplies a bank statement showing the deposit but no letter. A letter from three years ago that predates cost-of-living adjustments |
| Most recent benefit statement or proof of current receipt | Two months of bank statements showing the deposit, or the current-year benefit statement | The deposit is net of a Medicare premium and does not match the award letter — which is normal and needs a one-line explanation |
| Evidence of continuance — commonly three years from the note date | Income used to qualify must be expected to continue. The period is commonly stated as three years; verify | A disability benefit subject to periodic review, where the award letter names a re-examination date inside the continuance window. A pension with a term-certain end date. Ask for the expiration date explicitly — it is the field borrowers never volunteer |
| Retirement account distribution documentation, if drawing down assets | Statements showing the account, the distribution amount, the frequency, and enough remaining balance to continue for the required period | The borrower is taking irregular withdrawals rather than a scheduled distribution, which may not qualify |
| 1099-R and tax returns, as conditioned | Confirms the amount received and its tax treatment | The borrower's pension is partly taxable and partly not, and the split is not evident from the deposit |
Grossing up non-taxable income. When income is not subject to federal tax — much Social Security, certain disability payments, some VA benefits, some child support — programs commonly permit the income to be grossed up to a taxable equivalent for qualifying purposes.
| The mechanic | Multiply the non-taxable amount by (1 + the permitted percentage) |
| The permitted percentage | Commonly 15% to 25% depending on the program, and some programs tie it to the borrower's documented tax bracket. Verify against the current guide — this figure varies by program and changes |
| What must be proved | That the income actually is non-taxable. The tax returns are the evidence |
⚠️ Grossing up is the most under-used tool in retiree lending and the most over-promised. It can move a borrower across a ratio line. It also requires documentation that the income is genuinely untaxed, which the borrower's tax return either shows or does not. Never quote a grossed-up income before you have seen the return.
⚠️ Age is a prohibited basis under ECOA (Appendix D §D.9). You may ask when a benefit expires; you may not ask, imply, or reason about how long the borrower will live. The continuance question is about the income, never about the borrower.
E.9 Rental income
| Document | Why the underwriter wants it | What commonly goes wrong |
|---|---|---|
| Schedule E from the two most recent tax returns | The filed record of rents received and expenses. The standard source for a property owned for a full year | The property was acquired mid-year, so Schedule E reflects a partial year and understates it. The borrower deducted a large one-time repair |
| Current lease agreement, signed by all parties | Establishes current rent where Schedule E is unavailable or unrepresentative | A month-to-month or expired lease. A lease with a relative. A lease dated after the loan application, which underwriters read carefully |
| Evidence of receipt — bank statements showing deposits | Confirms the lease is real and the tenant pays | Rent paid in cash |
| Mortgage statement, tax bill, insurance, and HOA for the rental property | The full PITI of the rental is netted against the rent; the underwriter cannot compute net rental income without it | The borrower supplies the rent and not the expenses, and the file stalls |
| Appraisal Form 1007 / 1025, on the subject property when it will be rented | A market rent estimate for a subject-property rental | Ordered late, because nobody flagged the rental use at application |
| Evidence of landlord experience, where the program requires it | Some programs limit or discount rental income for a borrower with no history | The borrower assumes projected rent from a property they have never rented will count in full |
How rental income is generally computed: gross rent is reduced by a vacancy and maintenance factor — commonly 25% — and then the property's full PITI is subtracted. A positive result adds to income; a negative result is a monthly liability and hits the back-end ratio. The factor and the method vary by program and by whether the property is the subject or a retained property — verify.
⚠️ The most expensive rental-income surprise is a borrower converting their current home to a rental. Programs impose specific requirements — often a lease, evidence of a security deposit, and sometimes equity in the departing residence. Ask about the departing residence at application (§14, §16).
E.10 Alimony, child support, and separate maintenance
Received (used as income):
| Document | Why | What goes wrong |
|---|---|---|
| Divorce decree, separation agreement, or court order | Establishes the obligation, the amount, and the end date | The order is a modification and the original is also needed. The award is stated as a percentage of the payor's income rather than a fixed amount |
| Evidence of receipt — commonly 6 to 12 months, by bank deposits or a state disbursement record | Proves the money actually arrives, consistently and in full | Partial payments. Payments made in cash or by informal transfer. A payor who is chronically two weeks late |
| Evidence of continuance — commonly three years from the note date | Same rule as any other income | Child support ends when the child ages out. A borrower with a 16-year-old is very often inside the window, and this is the single most common denial cause in this category. Compute the end date at application |
Paid (counted as a debt):
| Document | Why | What goes wrong |
|---|---|---|
| The order establishing the obligation | The amount is a monthly liability in the back-end ratio | The borrower does not disclose it, and the underwriter finds it on the tax return or in a bank statement debit — which raises a misrepresentation question far more damaging than the debt itself |
| Evidence of the remaining term | Some programs allow an obligation with a short remaining term to be treated differently. Verify | Assuming the ten-month rule applies. It is program-specific and it does not apply universally |
⚠️ ECOA and voluntary disclosure. A creditor may not ask whether income is from alimony, child support, or separate maintenance unless the applicant is first told that such income need not be revealed if the applicant does not want it considered (Reg B; §25). Use your shop's approved language.
E.11 Second jobs, part-time, and seasonal work
| Document | Why | What goes wrong |
|---|---|---|
| Paystubs and W-2s from the secondary employer | Same documentation as the primary job | The borrower does not mention the second job because "it's only part time" — and then the deposits show up in the bank statements and require explanation |
| Evidence of a history — commonly two years of uninterrupted secondary employment | Establishes that the borrower can sustain the second job alongside the first | Eighteen months of history. The income does not count, and it is often the income that made the file work |
| Written VOE from the secondary employer addressing continuance | Both employers must be verified | The second employer is a small business with no HR |
| Seasonal work: two years of returns, and evidence of the pattern and of rehire | Seasonal income is averaged over 12 months, including the off-season | The borrower quotes their peak-season pay rate. The averaged figure is dramatically lower and it arrives as a shock |
| Gig and platform income: two years of tax returns, Schedule C, and 1099s | Generally treated as self-employment (§E.7), not as wages | The borrower thinks of a 1099 as a paystub. It is not — the deductions on Schedule C reduce the qualifying income |
E.12 Assets
Assets do two jobs — they fund the transaction and they prove reserves, which are a compensating factor. Both jobs require the same document discipline.
| Document | Why the underwriter wants it | What commonly goes wrong |
|---|---|---|
| Bank statements — commonly the two most recent months, ALL pages, all accounts used | Verifies the funds exist, are the borrower's, and are seasoned. The statement must show the institution name, the borrower's name, the account number (commonly the last four digits are sufficient), the period, and the balances | Pages missing. "Page 4 of 5" is one of the top three conditions in the industry. Online screenshots that show a balance but no name, no institution, and no period — these are almost universally rejected. Statements printed on a date that does not cover a full statement cycle |
| Large deposit documentation | See below | See below |
| Gift letter and evidence of transfer | See below | See below |
| Retirement account statements — the most recent quarterly or two monthly statements, plus terms of withdrawal | Confirms the vested balance and whether the funds can actually be accessed | A 401(k) with an outstanding loan, or a plan that permits withdrawal only on separation from service — in which case the money is not available at all. The funds are commonly discounted (a haircut) for taxes and penalties when liquidation is required; the percentage varies by program — verify |
| Evidence of liquidation, when retirement or investment funds are actually being used | The underwriter must see the money leave the source and arrive in an account you have verified | The borrower liquidates the day before closing and the wire cannot be traced |
| Stock, bond, and brokerage statements | Same as retirement; commonly discounted for market volatility. Verify the discount | The account statement covers a quarter and the funds must also be shown as current |
| Business funds used for down payment or reserves | Requires evidence of the borrower's access, and commonly a cash flow analysis showing the withdrawal will not harm the business | The borrower is a 50% owner with no unilateral right of withdrawal. Commingled personal and business accounts. Verify the requirements — they are strict and they surprise self-employed borrowers late in the file |
| Earnest money | Proves the deposit came from the borrower's own verified funds — not from an undisclosed loan | The check has not cleared, so there is nothing to trace. The deposit was paid by a relative. The earnest money came out of an account that was never disclosed |
| Sale of a departing residence | The final settlement statement (Closing Disclosure) from that sale, showing net proceeds | The sale is scheduled after the purchase closes, which changes the entire structure of the file |
| Sale of a personal asset | Bill of sale, evidence of ownership, evidence of value, and evidence of receipt of funds | "I sold my truck to a friend" with no documentation. This is an expensive way to learn about sourcing |
Large deposits and sourcing
The rule as commonly stated: a deposit that is not payroll and that exceeds 50% of the total monthly qualifying income is a "large deposit" requiring documentation of its source when the funds are needed to close. The threshold, the definition, and the treatment differ by program and by lender overlay — verify.
Now read the Linden Street file against that.
| Total monthly qualifying income | \$10,500.00 |
| The deposit | \$4,900.00 |
| As a percentage of monthly income | 46.7% |
| Was it sourced? | Yes — Condition 5, cleared day 33 |
⚠️ The deposit sat just under the commonly cited line and was sourced anyway. That is not an anomaly and it is the reason you must never tell a borrower "anything under half your monthly income is fine." Underwriters source deposits that do not look like the borrower's documented pay pattern, lenders write tighter overlays than the agencies, and a deposit that is 46.7% of income in an account being used to close is exactly the kind of thing a careful underwriter asks about. The right answer to "how big can a deposit be before you'll ask?" is "assume we'll ask."
What sourcing actually required here. The deposit was the net of a \$6,900.00 gross quarterly commission after \$2,000.00 of withholding** — \$6,900.00 − \$2,000.00 = **\$4,900.00. Note that \$4,900 appears nowhere else in the file.** It is not on the W-2 (\$23,400 for the year). It is not in the qualifying income (\$1,800.00 per month). The borrower could not source it with a single document, and neither could you. It took the commission statement showing the gross, plus the paystub** showing the withholding, plus a letter of explanation tying the two to the deposit date.
⚠️ THE \$4,900 IS NOT INCOME. IT IS AN ASSET-SOURCING CONDITION. The commission it represents is already inside Borrower 2's 24-month average of \$1,800.00 per month. Counting the deposit as additional income would be a double count — the same dollars claimed twice. This mistake is made, it is caught in audit, and it is the reason the sourcing condition and the income calculation must be kept in separate columns in your head (§14, §19).
The sourcing hierarchy — what actually satisfies an underwriter:
BEST a document from the payer, naming the borrower, the amount,
and the date, that reconciles to the deposit
GOOD a paper trail: a document from the source account showing the
money leaving, matched to the statement showing it arriving
WEAK a letter of explanation alone
USELESS " it was cash I had saved "
Cash is the wall. Undocumented cash cannot be sourced, cannot be seasoned by depositing it, and cannot be used. A borrower with cash savings needs to know this at the first conversation, because the cure — depositing it and letting it season — takes months, and there is no shortcut (§9, §14).
Gift funds and the gift letter
| Element | What it must contain / do | What goes wrong |
|---|---|---|
| The gift letter | The donor's name, address, and telephone number; the donor's relationship to the borrower; the dollar amount; the date of the transfer; an explicit statement that no repayment is expected or required; and signatures | A letter the loan officer wrote and the donor signed without reading. A missing "no repayment expected" sentence — the one sentence the whole document exists for. No donor phone number, which blocks verification |
| Evidence of the transfer | The donor's withdrawal or a wire confirmation, and the borrower's deposit showing the same amount on a consistent date; or certified funds delivered to the settlement agent, documented on the settlement statement | The amounts do not match because the wire fee was deducted. The gift was given in cash. The donor deposited it into an account the borrower never disclosed |
| Donor eligibility | Programs differ. Conventional loans commonly limit donors to relatives, a fiancé, or a domestic partner. FHA is broader, commonly permitting a relative, an employer or labor union, a close friend with a clearly defined and documented interest in the borrower, a charitable organization, or a governmental agency. Verify current eligibility with the guide | The donor is the seller, the builder, the real estate agent, or anyone else with an interest in the sale — which is not a gift; it is an interested-party contribution and it is governed by entirely different rules |
| Donor ability to give, where required | Some programs require evidence the donor had the funds — commonly the donor's bank statement. Requirements differ by program; verify | The donor considers their bank statement private and refuses. Ask early, and explain why, because refusal this late kills the gift |
| Occupancy and minimum contribution rules | Some programs require a minimum borrower contribution from their own funds at certain LTVs | Assuming a gift can fund 100% of the down payment on every program |
On the Linden Street file: a \$10,000.00 gift from Borrower 1's parents, cleared as Condition 6 on day 29 — gift letter signed by donors and recipients, plus evidence of transfer. Combined with \$28,000.00** across two savings accounts, verified funds total **\$38,000.00.
⚠️ The earnest money is separate, and it is already gone. The borrowers originally held \$43,000.00 and paid \$5,000.00 at contract on day 4. The \$38,000.00 is what remains. The earnest money appears as a credit on the cash-to-close build because it was already delivered — it is not sitting in the \$38,000.00 waiting to be spent again. Cash to close **\$25,376.34 against \$38,000.00 of verified funds leaves **\$12,623.66 = 4.16 months of PITI in reserves. Treating the earnest money as inside the \$38,000.00 gives \$7,623.66 and is wrong (§4, §14, Appendix A §A.9).
Reserves
| What they are | Verified liquid assets remaining after the down payment and all closing costs, expressed in months of PITI |
| Why they matter | A compensating factor in underwriting, and on some programs a hard requirement |
| What documents them | The same statements that documented the funds to close — no additional documentation, but the funds must remain verified |
| Linden Street | \$12,623.66 ÷ \$3,033.72 = 4.16 months — and after the day-46 furniture payoff, \$7,423.66 = 2.45 months |
⚠️ Reserves are the file's shock absorber, and spending them is a real cost. On Linden Street the crisis was resolved by paying off a \$5,200.00 furniture account from reserves. The DTI returned to 42.66% and the loan closed — but the borrowers walked into the house with 2.45 months of PITI instead of 4.16. That is the trade, and it should be named to the borrower when it is made (§19).
E.13 VA borrowers
Everything in §E.2, plus:
| Document | Why the underwriter wants it | What commonly goes wrong |
|---|---|---|
| Certificate of Eligibility (COE) | The VA's statement that this veteran has entitlement, how much, and whether the funding fee is exempt | Ordered late. The COE shows entitlement already in use on a prior VA loan — restoration takes time and paperwork |
| DD Form 214 (Member Copy 4) for discharged veterans | Service dates and character of discharge, which establish eligibility | The borrower has only Member Copy 1, which omits the character-of-service field |
| Statement of Service for active-duty borrowers | Current service, entry date, time lost, and command information | Signed by the wrong authority. Undated. Missing the entry-on-duty date |
| NGB Form 22 / 23 for National Guard and Reserve, as applicable | Qualifying service in the Guard or Reserve | Multiple periods of service and only one document supplied |
| Evidence of a service-connected disability award, if claiming the funding fee exemption | The funding fee exemption is significant money and must be documented — commonly reflected on the COE | The borrower says they are exempt and the COE says otherwise; resolve it before disclosing a fee-free structure |
| Leave and Earnings Statement (LES) for active-duty income | The military paystub: base pay, BAH, BAS, and special pays each on their own line | Allowances that will end on a permanent change of station. BAH is tied to duty station — a borrower buying at a location they are leaving is a serious problem |
| Occupancy certification | VA loans require the veteran to occupy, with specific timing rules and limited exceptions | An active-duty borrower whose spouse will occupy — permitted under defined conditions; verify |
| Termite / wood-destroying insect report, where required | A VA property requirement in many areas | Who may pay for it varies by state and by current VA policy — verify. Do not assume |
⚠️ Ask the entitlement question at the discovery call, not later. On the Linden Street file the loan officer asked about qualifying service on day 1; neither borrower had any, and the VA counterfactual — 0 down, no monthly MI — was closed out immediately rather than lingering as a "what if" (§13, §17).
E.14 FHA borrowers
Everything in §E.2, plus:
| Document | Why the underwriter wants it | What commonly goes wrong |
|---|---|---|
| FHA case number, assigned early | Ties the file to HUD's systems and locks the applicable rules | Assigned late, which delays the appraisal order, since the appraisal is ordered against the case number |
| Appraisal by an FHA roster appraiser, ordered under the case number | FHA appraisals carry minimum property requirements beyond value | A property with peeling paint on a pre-1978 home, a missing handrail, or an inoperable system — all repairable, all schedule killers if discovered late |
| Documentation supporting the 3.5% minimum required investment | The borrower's own funds or an eligible source | A DPA program that is not eligible under FHA's rules, or a source not documented in the way FHA requires |
| Gift documentation to FHA's standard | FHA's donor list is broader than conventional's and its documentation is commonly stricter — including evidence of the donor's ability | The gift letter meets conventional standards and not FHA's |
| Explanation and documentation of any delinquent federal debt | Delinquent federal debt is disqualifying until resolved; lenders check the government's system | Defaulted student loans the borrower had forgotten about |
| Payoff or subordination documentation for any secondary financing | FHA has specific rules on secondary financing and CLTV | The DPA second is documented as a grant when it is a lien, or the reverse |
The Harlow Street file shows what an FHA first-time-buyer file with assistance actually looks like: a single borrower, 641 representative score, \$4,150.00 gross monthly income, \$395.00** in monthly debts, a **\$215,000 purchase, FHA 203(b). The 3.5% minimum required investment of \$7,525.00** is funded by the DPA second. Base loan **\$207,475.00 (LTV 96.50%), UFMIP of 1.75% = \$3,630.81** financed, total loan **\$211,105.81 at 6.250% — P&I \$1,299.81**, annual MIP **\$96.76, taxes \$215.00, insurance \$110.00 → PITI + MIP \$1,721.57. Ratios 41.48% front / 51.00% back, which exceed the 31/43 manual benchmark and are approvable only on an Approve/Eligible from the TOTAL Scorecard with compensating factors. CLTV is 101.15% — (base loan + second) ÷ price. See §5, §16, §33.
E.15 USDA borrowers
Everything in §E.2, plus:
| Document | Why the underwriter wants it | What commonly goes wrong |
|---|---|---|
| Property eligibility determination | The property must be in an eligible rural area under USDA's current maps | The maps are revised. A property that was eligible last year may not be, and the borrower has already written an offer |
| Household income documentation for EVERY adult household member | ⚠️ USDA uses two different income figures. Repayment income is the borrowers'. Adjusted household income counts income of all adult household members whether or not they are on the loan, and is tested against a program limit | This is the most common USDA denial, and it is entirely avoidable: an adult child or a parent living in the home has income that counts toward the limit even though it cannot be used to qualify. Ask who lives in the household at the first conversation |
| Documentation of allowable deductions from household income | Childcare, dependents, disability, and elderly deductions can bring a household under the limit | Not claimed, because nobody asked |
| Form RD 3555-21, Request for Single Family Housing Loan Guarantee | The program's request document | Signed but incomplete |
| Evidence the borrower lacks other adequate housing and meets the program's eligibility criteria | USDA is a targeted program with its own eligibility rules | Assuming any rural property and any modest income qualifies |
⚠️ USDA income limits and eligible-area maps change. Verify both, on the current USDA system, before writing a pre-approval letter that names USDA.
E.16 First-time buyers with down payment assistance
DPA is where the most files break, because two sets of rules apply at once and they were not written to fit together.
| Document | Why the underwriter wants it | What commonly goes wrong |
|---|---|---|
| The DPA program's award or commitment letter | Establishes the amount, the form (grant, forgivable second, deferred second, repayable second), and the conditions | Issued in the borrower's name with a reservation number and an expiration date nobody tracked |
| The second-lien note and security instrument, if a lien | The first-lien lender must know the terms, the payment (if any), and the priority | The DPA agency's documents arrive at the closing table, unreviewed |
| Subordination agreement, where required | Establishes lien priority | Requested three days before closing, and the agency takes two weeks |
| Homebuyer education certificate | Most DPA programs and several loan products require it, commonly valid for 12 months — verify | Completed by one borrower and not both. Completed through a provider the program does not accept. Expired |
| The program's own income and purchase-price limits, computed the program's way | ⚠️ DPA programs commonly compute income differently from the AUS. A program may use household income, gross annualized income, or projected income where the AUS uses a two-year average | A borrower who qualifies for the mortgage and fails the DPA income test, or the reverse. Run both calculations at application |
| Documentation of the recapture or forgiveness terms | The borrower must understand what happens if they sell or refinance early | Nobody explains it, and the borrower discovers a repayment obligation years later |
| First-time buyer certification, where required | Commonly defined as not having owned a principal residence in the previous three years — verify the program's own definition | The borrower owned a home four years ago and assumes they are disqualified, or owned one two years ago and assumes they are not |
The Harlow Street DPA structure: a \$10,000 forgivable county second at 0%, forgiven at 20% per year over five years. No payment, no interest, and a clean title after five years of occupancy — but it is a lien, it must be documented, subordinated, and disclosed, and it lifts CLTV to 101.15%. See §33.
⚠️ DPA borrowers need more contact, not less. The Harlow Street borrower called twice a week and nearly walked away three times. The documentation burden is heavier, the timeline is longer, and the borrower has the least experience with any of it. Set that expectation in the first conversation (§8, §33).
E.17 Property-side documentation
The borrower is not the only thing being underwritten.
| Document | Why the underwriter wants it | What commonly goes wrong |
|---|---|---|
| Fully executed purchase contract, signed by all parties, with every addendum and amendment | The contract governs price, credits, dates, contingencies, and who pays what. Every disclosure is built from it | Amendments not forwarded. A repair addendum, a price change, or a closing-date extension that the lender never sees — and the CD is wrong as a result. An unsigned counteroffer page. Initials missing on a page |
| Closing-date extension addendum, when the closing date moves | The contract expires by its own terms | Everyone verbally agrees to a new date and nobody papers it. On Linden Street the original closing date of day 45 was missed and the file closed on day 51 — six calendar days that required a documented extension |
| Seller's disclosures, as applicable by state | Known defects; may trigger appraisal or repair issues | Handed to the buyer and never to the lender |
| Homeowners insurance binder or declarations page | Proof of coverage, effective on or before the closing date, with the lender named as mortgagee and the loan number and property address exactly right, and evidence the first year is paid | The mortgagee clause is wrong or missing. The dwelling coverage is below the required amount. The effective date is after closing. A high deductible that exceeds program limits. On Linden Street this is Condition 8: one year paid, lender named as mortgagee, cleared day 30 |
| Flood determination | Required on every file; determines whether flood insurance is mandatory (Appendix D §D.21) | Returned inside a special flood hazard area after the payment was quoted — which changes PITI, ratios, and the disclosure |
| Flood insurance policy, if in a hazard area | Mandatory coverage at the required amount | Ordered too late; the required waiting period was not anticipated |
| Title commitment | The title company's statement of what it will insure and what it will not. Schedule A is the deal; Schedule B-I is what must be done; Schedule B-II is what will be excepted | Exceptions nobody read. On Linden Street the commitment received on day 19 carried a prior owner's mechanic's lien on Schedule B-II — a \$14,780.00 roofing claim for work contracted by a prior owner. It was released and re-recorded on day 30, because the first release described the wrong lot number. A release that describes the wrong land releases nothing (§21) |
| Payoff statements for any liens to be cleared | Required for exact figures at closing | Requested late; good-through dates expire; per-diem interest accrues past the quoted date |
| Survey, where customary or required | Establishes boundaries, encroachments, and easements | Requirements vary enormously by state — required and routine in some, essentially never used in others |
| Well and septic certifications, where required | Property requirements on government programs and in rural areas | Seasonal — some tests cannot be performed in freezing conditions |
| Termite / wood-destroying insect report, where required | Program and regional requirement | Who may pay for it varies by state and program — verify |
| Appraisal | The lender's document. The borrower receives a copy under Reg B §1002.14 (Appendix D §D.9) | A value below contract. On Cypress Court, \$505,000 against a \$540,000 contract — a \$28,000 gap that arrived with 11 days to closing (§18, §20) |
| Certificate of occupancy, new construction | The property is legally habitable | Not issued at the scheduled closing |
Condominium projects — the file inside the file
A condo means the project is underwritten as well as the unit, and this is where timelines silently die.
| Document | Why | What goes wrong |
|---|---|---|
| Condominium questionnaire (limited or full, per the project review type) | Owner-occupancy ratios, single-entity ownership concentration, delinquency percentage, commercial space percentage, litigation, and the developer's status | The HOA management company charges a fee and takes two to four weeks. Order it the day the contract is executed, not when underwriting asks |
| HOA budget and, where required, the reserve study | Programs commonly require a minimum percentage of the budget allocated to reserves | The budget is a one-page summary with no reserve line |
| Master insurance policy — hazard, liability, and where required fidelity/crime and flood | The project's coverage protects the collateral | Coverage below the required amount; a fidelity bond that does not exist |
| HO-6 walls-in policy, where the master policy is bare-walls | Covers the unit interior | Discovered at the closing table, which changes PITI |
| Litigation documentation, if any | Most programs will not accept a project with material litigation, with narrow exceptions | The questionnaire says "yes" and nobody asks what the litigation is about |
| Recorded declaration, bylaws, and any amendments | Project structure and any restrictions on transfer | A right of first refusal that the program does not permit |
| Structural and reserve-related certifications | Requirements around deferred maintenance and special assessments have tightened significantly and continue to change — verify the current agency requirements | The project is on a list the borrower knows nothing about |
⚠️ Order condominium documents on day one. They are the longest-lead item in most files, they are controlled by a third party with no stake in your closing date, and no amount of borrower cooperation speeds them up (§21).
E.18 What expires and when
⚠️ Every period in this table is stated as commonly applied by major programs. They differ by program, by investor, and by transaction type, and they change. Verify each against the current guide before you rely on it. Where a program's requirement and an investor overlay differ, the shorter window governs your file.
| Document | Commonly stated shelf life | What actually triggers a problem |
|---|---|---|
| Paystubs | Most recent 30 days at the time collected; on many files required to be current as of the note date | A file that slips a month needs new stubs — and the new stubs may show new income, new deductions, or a new garnishment |
| W-2s and tax returns | The two most recent years; once a filing deadline passes, the newest year is commonly required | A file that crosses into a new filing season needs the newest return, and a self-employed borrower's newest return can change the qualifying income entirely |
| Bank statements and other asset documentation | Most recent two months commonly; documents commonly must be no more than 120 days old at the note date | A delay past the window requires new statements — which show new deposits, which require new sourcing, which is how one condition becomes four |
| Credit report | Commonly 120 days at the note date | The re-pull is not just an age problem — it is a new report, and everything on it is new information |
| Verbal verification of employment | A short window before the note date — the period is program-specific. Verify with the current guide; do not quote it from memory | Holidays and closed HR departments. A borrower who resigned and did not tell you |
| Appraisal | Commonly 12 months on conventional loans, with an appraisal update required after roughly 4 months; commonly 180 days on FHA and VA | An appraisal that ages past the update trigger while a file sits |
| Title commitment | Effective for a limited period, with an update or bring-down search at closing | A new lien recorded between the commitment and the closing — a judgment, a tax lien, or a contractor's claim |
| Flood determination | Commonly obtained with life-of-loan tracking | Maps are redrawn after closing |
| Homeowners insurance binder | Must be effective on or before the closing date | A binder written for the original closing date, when closing moves |
| Rate lock | Its stated term, exactly | On Linden Street the 30-day lock taken day 12 expired day 42 — three days before the contract's own named closing date. It was short the moment it was taken. The 15-day extension cost 0.250 point = \$914.38, absorbed by the lender (§20, §30) |
| Purchase contract | Its own stated closing date and contingency deadlines | The closing date passes without a written extension |
| Homebuyer education certificate | Commonly 12 months | Expires mid-file on a long DPA transaction |
| DPA reservation or commitment | Program-specific, often short | The reservation expires and the funds are gone — some programs have waiting lists |
| Government photo ID | Must be unexpired at closing | Renewed at the DMV the week of closing, producing a temporary paper ID the notary may not accept |
| Certificate of Eligibility (VA) | Generally does not expire, but entitlement must be re-checked against current usage | Entitlement tied up in a prior VA loan |
| Pre-approval letter | Whatever you wrote on it — and you should write something | An open-ended pre-approval used six months later against a credit profile that has changed |
The re-verification trap
The lesson of the Linden Street file is not that documents expired. It is that the last two conditions were designed to be run at the end — and one of them found something.
Two conditions on that file were prior to funding, not prior to document:
Condition 10 Verbal VOE, both borrowers, within the required window
before the note date [ PTF ]
Condition 11 Pre-closing credit refresh / undisclosed-debt report;
DTI may not exceed the approved ratio [ PTF ]
Condition 11 was written on day 28. On day 41 — thirteen days later, and entirely unknown to the loan officer — the borrowers financed \$5,200.00 of furniture on a nine-month promotional plan. On day 44 the pre-closing credit refresh found it: a \$611.00 monthly payment that drove the back-end ratio from 42.66% to 48.48%.
⚠️ Condition 11 did exactly what it was written to do. It was not a formality and it was not a delay. It was a tripwire, set sixteen days before the event it caught. The file survived because the borrowers paid the account in full from reserves on day 46 and documented it with a zero-balance letter and a paid-in-full statement — restoring the 42.66% ratio and dropping reserves from 4.16 months to 2.45 months. It cost four business days and the original closing date.
What this means for your borrower conversation, said at application and again at approval:
UNTIL THE LOAN FUNDS, DO NOT:
open any new credit account, including store cards and " no interest
for nine months " financing at a furniture or appliance retailer
finance a car, a boat, or a home improvement
co-sign for anyone
change jobs, change from salary to commission, or go from
employee to contractor
move money between accounts without telling us
make a large deposit you cannot document
close a credit card or pay off a collection without asking first
let an authorized-user account be added to your file
Say it twice, and put it in writing. The Linden Street borrowers were not reckless; they were buying furniture for the house they were about to own, at a store that offered financing at the register. That is the most ordinary thing in the world, and it nearly cost them the loan (§19, §30).
E.19 The Linden Street document set, as it actually assembled
The complete file, by category, with the day each piece landed. This is what "a clean file" looks like in practice.
UNIVERSAL DAY
Photo identification, both borrowers 5
Signed URLA + complete initial disclosure package 29 [ Cond. 1 ]
Borrower's authorization, both borrowers 1
IRS Form 4506-C, both borrowers 29 [ Cond. 4 ]
Verification of rent, 36 months at $1,850.00/mo 7
INCOME -- BORROWER 1, registered nurse, W-2, 3 years
Paystubs, most recent 30 days, current as of note date 29 [ Cond. 2 ]
W-2s, two years
Written VOE 7 ( requested )
Earnings breakout supporting base vs. differential + OT
base ......... $33.00/hr x 2,080 / 12 ....... $5,720.00
variable ..... 24-month average ............... $580.00
( $6,720 + $7,200 = $13,920 / 24 )
INCOME -- BORROWER 2, outside sales, W-2 base + commission, 4 years
Paystubs, most recent 30 days 29 [ Cond. 2 ]
W-2s, two years
Written VOE, commission continuity + most recent
commission statement 30 [ Cond. 3 ]
base ......... $28,800 / 12 ................. $2,400.00
commission ... ( $19,800 + $23,400 ) / 24 ... $1,800.00
trend rising +18.18%; last year alone
would give $1,950.00 -- the 24-month
rule costs this borrower $150.00/month
TOTAL QUALIFYING INCOME ....................... $10,500.00
variable share ... $2,380.00 / $10,500.00 ......... 22.67%
ASSETS
Savings, two accounts, three months of statements .. $28,000.00
Gift letter + evidence of transfer, B1's parents .. $10,000.00
[ Cond. 6, day 29 ]
VERIFIED FUNDS ..................................... $38,000.00
Earnest money $5,000.00 paid at contract on day 4 -- SEPARATE,
already delivered, and NOT part of the $38,000.00
Letter of explanation + source documentation,
the $4,900.00 deposit 33 [ Cond. 5 ]
$6,900.00 gross quarterly commission
- $2,000.00 withholding = $4,900.00 net
NOT INCOME -- already inside the 24-month average
CREDIT
Tri-merge report, both borrowers 1
B1 742 / 738 / 751 -> middle 742
B2 706 / 712 / 698 -> middle 706
REPRESENTATIVE SCORE ....... 706 ( lower of the two middles )
No lates in 24 months, no public records, no collections
Pre-closing credit refresh 44 [ Cond. 11 ]
Zero-balance letter + paid-in-full statement, furniture
account 47
PROPERTY
Purchase contract, executed 4
Appraisal ordered .. 7 returned at $385,000 .. 16
Flood determination -- OUTSIDE the special flood hazard area
Title ordered .. 7 search dated 17 commitment 19
Schedule B-II: prior owner's mechanic's lien, $14,780.00
released and RE-RECORDED ( first release named the
wrong lot ) 30 [ Cond. 7 ]
Homeowners insurance, one year paid, lender named
as mortgagee 30 [ Cond. 8 ]
Mortgage insurance certificate, 0.58% annual factor 33 [ Cond. 9 ]
PRE-FUNDING
Verbal VOE, both borrowers [ Cond. 10 ]
AUS re-run; CLEAR TO CLOSE 47
Closing Disclosure received ( Tuesday ) 48
CLOSING, funding, recording ( Friday ) 51
Read the day column. Nine prior-to-document conditions cleared between day 29 and day 33 — five calendar days, three business days, because days 31 and 32 were a weekend. Then the file sat for eleven days. The documents were never the problem (§6, §19, §30).
E.20 The one-page list you can actually hand a borrower
Everything above is for you. This is for them — plain, short, and free of jargon. Adapt it to the file; do not hand a self-employed borrower a W-2 list.
WHAT WE NEED FROM YOU
IDENTIFICATION
[ ] A current, unexpired photo ID for each person on the loan
INCOME ( each person, each job )
[ ] Your last 30 days of paystubs -- every stub, all pages
[ ] Your W-2s for the last two years -- every employer
[ ] If you earn overtime, bonus, shift differential, or commission:
a paystub that shows those amounts on their own lines, and
your last commission or bonus statement
[ ] If you are self-employed or own 25% or more of a business:
two years of personal AND business tax returns, complete,
every page and every schedule, signed
[ ] If you receive retirement, Social Security, disability, or
pension income: your award letter and proof you are receiving it
[ ] If you receive child support or alimony and want it counted:
the court order and proof of the last several payments
MONEY
[ ] Two months of statements for every account you will use --
ALL pages, including the ones that look blank
[ ] For any deposit that is not your paycheck: what it was
and where it came from, with a document that proves it
[ ] If someone is giving you money toward the purchase:
tell us BEFORE it moves. There is a form the giver signs,
and we need to see the money leave their account and
arrive in yours.
[ ] Retirement or investment accounts: the most recent statement
THE HOUSE
[ ] The signed purchase contract and EVERY amendment or addendum
[ ] Your insurance agent's name and phone number
PAPERWORK WE WILL SEND YOU
[ ] The application -- sign AND date every page we mark
[ ] The disclosure package -- return it complete
[ ] IRS Form 4506-C -- this lets us confirm your tax returns
ONE MORE THING, AND IT MATTERS MOST
From today until the day you get the keys, please do not:
open a new credit account of any kind -- including store
financing for furniture or appliances, even at 0%
finance a vehicle
co-sign for anyone
change jobs or how you are paid
move large amounts of money between accounts without telling us
close accounts or pay off collections without asking us first
If something changes -- anything -- call me the same day.
Almost everything is fixable when we know about it early.
Very little is fixable the week of closing.
⚠️ The last block is not boilerplate. On the Linden Street file the borrowers financed \$5,200.00 of furniture on day 41, four days before the scheduled closing, at a store that offered financing at the register. The \$611.00 monthly payment drove the back-end ratio to 48.48%, the file missed its closing date, and the cure cost the borrowers half their reserves. Nothing on this list matters more.
E.21 The habits that prevent conditions
- Collect the whole set at application, not in response to conditions. Every condition costs a day of calendar and a unit of borrower goodwill.
- Open every document you receive, immediately, and count the pages. A statement labeled "1 of 5" with four pages attached should never reach an underwriter.
- Reconcile before you submit. Does the income on the application match the paystubs? Does the address on the ID match the application? Does the deposit total on the bank statement match the sum of the parts? An underwriter who finds the mismatch is an underwriter who now reads everything twice.
- Ask "is there anything else?" three times — at application, at submission, and at approval. The answer changes.
- Name the shelf life when you collect the document. "These paystubs are good for about a month — if we're still working in mid-October I'll need new ones" converts a future condition into an expected event.
- Order the long-lead items first: condominium documents, title, payoffs, verifications from third-party services, and anything involving a government agency or a homeowners association.
- Put the do-not-do list in writing, and repeat it at approval, which is exactly when borrowers relax.
Cross-references: §8–§9 (the discovery call and pre-approval) · §10 (credit) · §11 (the self-employed conversation) · §13 (program comparison) · §14–§16 (documentation and underwriting) · §17 (VA) · §18 (appraisal) · §19 (conditions and the day-44 crisis) · §21 (title) · §23 (escrow) · §27 (fraud) · §30 (what the file teaches) · §32 (self-employed cash flow) · §33 (DPA and first-time buyers) · §35 (closing) · Appendix A (formulas) · Appendix D (federal law).