Chapter 28 Further Reading: The Measurement Problem
Tier 1: Essential References
These are the primary references that cover the material of this chapter at a level closely matching our treatment. You should consult at least one of these.
Bell, J. S. — Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics, 2nd ed. (2004)
The collected papers of John Stewart Bell on quantum foundations. Every paper is a model of clarity and intellectual honesty. Particularly relevant to this chapter: - "Against 'Measurement'" (1990) — Bell's devastating critique of the word "measurement" and its role in obscuring the measurement problem. Perhaps the single best essay ever written on quantum foundations. - "Quantum Mechanics for Cosmologists" (1981) — A clear introduction to the measurement problem with particular attention to the cosmological context. - "On the Impossible Pilot Wave" (1982) — Bell's defense of Bohmian mechanics. - Best for: Everyone. These papers are accessible, profound, and essential.
Schlosshauer, M. — Decoherence and the Quantum-to-Classical Transition (2007)
The definitive technical treatment of the decoherence program. Schlosshauer covers the physics of decoherence (models, timescales, einselection), its experimental confirmations, and its relationship to the interpretations of quantum mechanics. Chapter 2 (formalism) and Chapter 8 (interpretations) are essential reading. - Best for: Students who want a thorough understanding of decoherence — what it does, what it does not do, and how it relates to the measurement problem.
Schlosshauer, M. — Quantum Decoherence (2019)
A shorter, more accessible overview of decoherence for a broad audience. Covers the same ground as the 2007 book but with fewer technical details. - Best for: Students who want a clear introduction to decoherence without committing to a 400-page monograph.
Wallace, D. — The Emergent Multiverse: Quantum Theory according to the Everett Interpretation (2012)
The most rigorous modern defense of the many-worlds interpretation. Wallace addresses the probability problem, the preferred basis problem, and the relationship between MWI and decoherence with exceptional philosophical sophistication. Not easy reading, but essential for anyone who wants to take many-worlds seriously. - Best for: Students drawn to many-worlds who want to see the strongest version of the case.
Maudlin, T. — Quantum Non-Locality and Relativity, 3rd ed. (2011)
Tim Maudlin is a philosopher of physics who writes with extraordinary clarity about the foundations of quantum mechanics. This book focuses on the tension between quantum nonlocality and special relativity, but the first several chapters provide one of the best introductions to the measurement problem in print. - Best for: Students who want a philosophically rigorous treatment of the measurement problem and Bell's theorem.
Tier 2: Supplementary and Enrichment
Interpretations: Detailed Treatments
Dürr, D., Goldstein, S. & Zanghì, N. — Quantum Physics Without Quantum Philosophy (2013) The most complete modern treatment of Bohmian mechanics. The authors (the leading Bohmian research group) cover the theory's foundations, its empirical equivalence with standard QM, and its extension to quantum field theory. Technically demanding but definitive. - Best for: Students interested in Bohmian mechanics who want the full mathematical treatment.
Fuchs, C. A. — Coming of Age with Quantum Information (2011) A collection of Christopher Fuchs's letters and papers on QBism and quantum information. Idiosyncratic, personal, and intellectually stimulating. The essay "Quantum Mechanics as Quantum Information (and only a little more)" is a key QBism manifesto. - Best for: Students who want to understand QBism from its primary architect.
Griffiths, R. B. — Consistent Quantum Theory (2003) Robert Griffiths's textbook-length development of the consistent histories approach. Thorough and careful, though advocates will find the interpretation more compelling than critics. - Best for: Students who want to understand consistent histories in detail, from a sympathetic perspective.
Ghirardi, G. C. — Sneaking a Look at God's Cards: Unraveling the Mysteries of Quantum Mechanics, rev. ed. (2007) A popular-level book by one of the creators of the GRW objective collapse theory. Ghirardi provides an exceptionally clear overview of the measurement problem and a compelling case for taking spontaneous collapse seriously. - Best for: An accessible introduction to objective collapse theories.
Historical and Philosophical
Becker, A. — What Is Real? The Unfinished Quest for the Meaning of Quantum Physics (2018) A popular history of the measurement problem, from the Bohr-Einstein debates through Bell's theorem to modern interpretive debates. Becker is particularly good on the sociology of physics — why the measurement problem was marginalized for decades and how it returned to respectability. - Best for: Everyone. Accessible, well-researched, and engaging. An excellent companion to this chapter.
Freire, O. — The Quantum Dissidents: Rebuilding the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics (1950-1990) (2015) A scholarly history of the physicists (Bohm, Bell, Everett, Clauser, Aspect, and others) who challenged the Copenhagen hegemony. Documents how the measurement problem went from a taboo topic to a legitimate research program. - Best for: Students interested in the history and sociology of quantum foundations.
Jammer, M. — The Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics (1974) The most comprehensive historical-philosophical survey of quantum mechanics interpretations. Dated but encyclopedic. Chapters on Copenhagen, hidden variables, many-worlds, and the quantum theory of measurement remain valuable references. - Best for: Comprehensive historical reference (treat as a scholarly resource, not a reading assignment).
Albert, D. Z. — Quantum Mechanics and Experience (1992) A short, philosophically rigorous introduction to the measurement problem for non-specialists. Albert is a philosopher who understands the physics deeply and explains it without equations. His chapter on the measurement problem is one of the clearest treatments in any medium. - Best for: Students who want a clear, concise philosophical introduction.
Technical Papers
Zurek, W. H. — "Decoherence, einselection, and the quantum origins of the classical" (2003), Reviews of Modern Physics, 75, 715-775. Zurek's comprehensive review article on the decoherence program and einselection. Technical but self-contained. This is the primary reference for the physics of einselection discussed in Section 28.5.
Schlosshauer, M. — "Decoherence, the measurement problem, and interpretations of quantum mechanics" (2004), Reviews of Modern Physics, 76, 1267-1305. A masterful review that cleanly separates what decoherence accomplishes from what it does not, and examines its role in each major interpretation.
Frauchiger, D. & Renner, R. — "Quantum theory cannot consistently describe the use of itself" (2018), Nature Communications, 9, 3711. The original Frauchiger-Renner paper. Technically accessible (the argument is conceptual rather than mathematical) and highly influential. Essential reading for understanding the modern state of the Wigner's friend debate.
Brukner, C. — "A no-go theorem for observer-independent facts" (2018), Entropy, 20, 350. An independent derivation of results similar to Frauchiger-Renner, using a different formulation. Clear and concise.
Proietti, M. et al. — "Experimental test of local observer-independence" (2019), Science Advances, 5, eaaw9832. The photonic Wigner's friend experiment discussed in Case Study 1. Demonstrates the tension between inner and outer observer descriptions experimentally.
Tier 3: Advanced and Specialized
For Future Research
Bassi, A. et al. — "Models of wave-function collapse, underlying theories, and experimental tests" (2013), Reviews of Modern Physics, 85, 471-527. A comprehensive review of objective collapse models (GRW, CSL, Penrose) including experimental constraints. Essential for students interested in the experimental testability of interpretations.
Goldstein, S. — "Bohmian Mechanics" (2021), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The definitive encyclopedia article on Bohmian mechanics, written by one of its leading proponents. Free online. Rigorous, fair, and thorough.
Caves, C. M., Fuchs, C. A. & Schack, R. — "Quantum probabilities as Bayesian probabilities" (2002), Physical Review A, 65, 022305. The foundational QBism paper. Technical but readable. Establishes the Bayesian interpretation of quantum probabilities.
Hartle, J. B. — "The quasiclassical realms of this quantum universe" (2011), Foundations of Physics, 41, 982-1006. Hartle's vision of how consistent histories and decoherence explain the classical appearance of the quantum universe. Important for the cosmological application of the measurement problem.
Tegmark, M. — "The interpretation of quantum mechanics: Many worlds or many words?" (1998), Fortschritte der Physik, 46, 855-862. A provocative essay arguing that the differences between interpretations are largely semantic. Whether you agree or disagree, it sharpens your thinking about what interpretive claims actually assert.
Online Resources
Video Lectures
Sidney Coleman — "Quantum Mechanics in Your Face" (1994) A legendary lecture by one of the greatest physics lecturers, originally given at the New England Section of the APS. Coleman makes the case that quantum mechanics is straightforward, and it is our classical intuitions that are problematic. Available on YouTube. - Best for: A master class in clear thinking about quantum foundations.
Sean Carroll — "Something Deeply Hidden" talks (2019-present) Carroll is a prominent many-worlds advocate who explains the interpretation with exceptional clarity. His various lectures and podcast episodes on the topic are accessible and stimulating. - Best for: Students interested in the many-worlds interpretation.
Tim Maudlin — Various lectures on quantum foundations Maudlin's lectures (many available on YouTube) are models of philosophical precision applied to physics. He is particularly good on Bell's theorem and the measurement problem. - Best for: Students who value rigorous philosophical analysis.
Written Resources
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy — entries on "The Measurement Problem," "The Role of Decoherence in Quantum Mechanics," "Many-Worlds Interpretation," "Bohmian Mechanics," "Quantum-Bayesian and Pragmatist Views" The SEP is the gold standard for philosophy of physics articles. Each entry is peer-reviewed, regularly updated, and free. These entries collectively provide a comprehensive philosophical survey of the measurement problem. - Best for: Reference and deeper philosophical engagement. Free at plato.stanford.edu.
Schlosshauer, M., Kofler, J. & Zeilinger, A. — "A snapshot of foundational attitudes toward quantum mechanics" (2011), Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B, 42, 222-230. The most famous "poll" of physicists' views on the interpretation of quantum mechanics, taken at a conference in 2011. Provides data on the distribution of interpretive preferences discussed in Section 28.12.
Reading Strategy
For Chapter 28, we recommend:
-
Everyone: Read Bell's "Against 'Measurement'" (15 pages, available in Speakable and Unspeakable). It is the single most important paper on quantum foundations, and it will permanently sharpen your thinking about the measurement problem.
-
For decoherence in depth: Read Schlosshauer's 2004 Reviews of Modern Physics article. It is the best single source for understanding what decoherence does and does not accomplish.
-
For many-worlds: Read Wallace, Chapters 1-3 of The Emergent Multiverse. Even if you are not convinced, you will understand the strongest version of the argument.
-
For Bohmian mechanics: Read Bell's "On the Impossible Pilot Wave" and Goldstein's SEP article. Together they provide a clear and sympathetic introduction.
-
For QBism: Read Fuchs's essay "QBism, the Perimeter of Quantum Bayesianism" (2010, available on arXiv). It is the most accessible introduction by the theory's primary architect.
-
For the historical/sociological context: Read Becker's What Is Real? — a compelling narrative of how the measurement problem went from taboo to mainstream.
-
For the Frauchiger-Renner thought experiment: Read the original paper (2018, Nature Communications). It is conceptual rather than mathematical and is accessible to any student who has completed Chapters 23-24 of this textbook.