Midterm Exam
How to Learn Anything — Midterm Assessment
Covering Chapters 1–16
Time allowed: 75 minutes Total points: 100 Materials: Closed book, closed notes
Instructor note: This exam is designed to model the assessment principles taught in the course. Questions require application, not just recall of definitions. If students have genuinely used retrieval practice while studying, the exam should feel fair. If they have relied on rereading, the application questions will reveal that gap — which is the most valuable lesson the exam can deliver.
SECTION A: Multiple Choice (40 points, 2 points each)
Choose the best answer for each question.
1. Dunlosky and colleagues rated ten common study techniques for their effectiveness. Which two received "high utility" ratings?
a) Highlighting and summarization b) Keyword mnemonics and imagery c) Practice testing and distributed practice d) Rereading and elaborative interrogation e) Concept mapping and self-explanation
Answer: C
2. A student reads Chapter 5 three times before her quiz. She scores 72%. She is surprised — she felt she understood the material. The most likely explanation for this gap is:
a) The quiz was poorly written b) She was suffering from the fluency illusion c) She has a working memory deficit d) Rereading is effective only for some types of content e) She needed more sleep before the quiz
Answer: B Note: B is the most directly supported answer. A and D cannot be ruled out from the scenario, but the fluency illusion is the mechanism the chapter specifically identifies.
3. According to Bjork's storage/retrieval distinction, which of the following best explains why cramming for an exam can produce a good exam score but poor retention two weeks later?
a) The material studied during cramming is encoded in a different memory system b) Cramming increases retrieval strength but does not build storage strength c) Students who cram are usually more anxious, which impairs consolidation d) The time of day when cramming occurs interferes with REM sleep e) Massed practice primarily benefits procedural rather than declarative memory
Answer: B
4. The testing effect, as documented by Roediger and Karpicke (2006), refers to:
a) The tendency for students to become better at taking tests with practice b) The improvement in long-term retention that results from taking retrieval tests compared to restudying c) The finding that performance on standardized tests predicts academic success d) The anxiety-reducing effect of frequent low-stakes testing e) The improvement in metacognitive accuracy produced by receiving test feedback
Answer: B
5. Which of the following best explains why the interleaving of practice problems feels less effective than blocked practice even when it produces better long-term learning?
a) Interleaving requires more working memory capacity, causing fatigue b) The fluency produced by blocked practice is mistaken by students for genuine learning c) Interleaving is only effective for some types of material d) Students in interleaved conditions score lower on immediate tests, creating a false impression e) Both B and D contribute to the interleaving illusion
Answer: E (or B, which is the primary mechanism; D contributes)
6. A student who is "well-calibrated" in their metacognitive monitoring would:
a) Always feel confident before assessments b) Consistently feel uncertain about material they have not yet studied c) Have a close match between their predicted and actual test performance d) Never use study strategies without first researching their effectiveness e) Accurately report the content of chapters they have read
Answer: C
7. The generation effect (Slamecka & Graf, 1978) predicts that:
a) Creating your own mnemonics is more effective than using provided ones b) Generating an answer from partial cues produces better retention than reading the full answer c) Students who write their own test questions perform better than those who answer provided questions d) Both A and B reflect the generation effect e) Both A, B, and C reflect the generation effect
Answer: E (all three are valid expressions of the generation effect)
8. Encoding specificity (Tulving & Thomson, 1973) implies that memory retrieval is most successful when:
a) The learner has high intrinsic motivation for the material b) The retrieval context matches the encoding context c) The material has been rehearsed multiple times d) The learner uses elaborative interrogation during encoding e) The material was encoded during peak alertness hours
Answer: B
9. The working memory model proposed by Baddeley and Hitch identifies which of the following as a component?
a) Episodic memory and semantic memory b) Phonological loop and visuo-spatial sketchpad c) Long-term potentiation and cortisol regulation d) Storage strength and retrieval strength e) Explicit memory and implicit memory
Answer: B
10. Research on multitasking consistently finds that:
a) Some individuals ("supertaskers") can genuinely multitask without performance costs b) Multitasking is more effective for procedural than declarative tasks c) The cognitive cost of task-switching increases with the complexity of the tasks involved d) Multitasking produces equivalent performance to focused work for most routine tasks e) Media multitasking improves with practice over time
Answer: C (A is partially true — about 2.5% of people show minimal multitasking costs — but C is the primary finding across the research)
11. According to the desirable difficulties framework, which of the following is most likely to feel unproductive during practice but produce better long-term learning?
a) Clear, step-by-step worked examples immediately before practice problems b) Learning material in a consistent, familiar study environment c) Rereading a chapter until all key concepts feel familiar d) Testing yourself on material before studying it (pre-testing) e) Studying one subject area thoroughly before moving to another
Answer: D
12. Sleep's role in memory consolidation is best described as:
a) Providing passive rest that allows neural fatigue to resolve b) An active process during which newly encoded memories are stabilized and integrated c) Primarily important for procedural memory and less so for declarative memory d) Most relevant for the first 24 hours after encoding and negligible thereafter e) An effect of REM sleep only, with non-REM sleep having no memory function
Answer: B
13. In Karpicke and Blunt (2011), students who practiced retrieval outperformed students who created detailed concept maps on a test one week later. Which explanation is most consistent with the broader research literature?
a) Concept mapping is a passive strategy that does not engage the learner actively b) Retrieval practice specifically strengthens the storage and retrieval pathways, which concept mapping does not c) Concept maps impose excessive cognitive load, impairing encoding d) Visual learning strategies are less effective than verbal strategies e) The study was poorly designed and the finding has not replicated
Answer: B
14. A student who notices that she feels like she "knows" the chapter right after reading it, but cannot answer quiz questions on it later, should most directly be advised to:
a) Read the chapter more slowly and carefully b) Create visual diagrams of the main concepts c) Use blank-page recall after reading to test whether she can actually reproduce the content d) Review her notes regularly throughout the week e) Schedule a tutoring session to confirm her understanding
Answer: C
15. According to the depth of processing framework (Craik & Lockhart, 1972), which of the following processing activities would be expected to produce the best memory for a new vocabulary word?
a) Counting the number of syllables in the word b) Noting whether the word is printed in uppercase or lowercase c) Checking whether the word contains a specific letter d) Generating a sentence that uses the word meaningfully in context e) Copying the word five times to a notebook
Answer: D
16. The "learning styles" hypothesis, in its strongest form (the "meshing hypothesis"), claims:
a) Individuals have preferences for certain types of instruction b) Matching instruction to a learner's preferred modality improves learning outcomes c) Visual, auditory, and kinesthetic processing systems are neurologically separate d) Multiple intelligences (Gardner) correspond to different learning styles e) Learning styles are determined by brain hemisphere dominance
Answer: B (B is the specific claim that has been tested and not supported)
17. Which of the following is the best example of elaborative interrogation?
a) Rereading a paragraph three times until it feels familiar b) Highlighting the most important sentences in a chapter c) Asking "why would this relationship between variables hold?" about a finding you just read d) Making a flashcard with the definition of a key term e) Drawing a diagram of the main concepts in a chapter
Answer: C
18. The primary reason that distributed (spaced) practice outperforms massed practice for long-term retention is:
a) Distributed practice allows more sleep between sessions, improving consolidation b) Distributed practice allows the learner to encounter the material in more varied contexts c) Each retrieval attempt against forgetting strengthens storage strength more than retrieval when memory is strong d) Massed practice overloads working memory, causing encoding failure e) Distributed practice provides more feedback opportunities
Answer: C
19. Leroy's (2009) concept of "attentional residue" describes:
a) The tendency to remember emotionally significant events better than neutral ones b) The cognitive resources that continue processing a previous task after switching to a new one c) The partial memories that remain after the main memory trace has decayed d) The attention benefits of arousal-inducing stimuli (coffee, exercise) during learning e) The residual benefit of spaced repetition that persists even after active review stops
Answer: B
20. A researcher conducts a study showing that students who drink chamomile tea before studying score 5% higher on next-day tests than students who do not. The p-value is 0.02 (statistically significant). Before changing your study habits based on this finding, you should ask:
a) How large is the sample size? b) What is the effect size? c) Has the finding been independently replicated? d) Was the study blinded? e) All of the above
Answer: E
SECTION B: Short Answer — Application Scenarios (30 points, 7–8 points each)
Answer each question in 150–250 words. Your answers will be evaluated on: (a) accurate use of course concepts, (b) specific and relevant application to the scenario, and (c) quality of reasoning.
Question 21. Marcus is preparing for his pharmacology exam in three days. He plans to spend 6 hours reviewing his notes today — rereading them carefully and highlighting key terms. He has not looked at this material in three weeks. Diagnose the problems with Marcus's study plan and prescribe a better alternative for the time and material he has.
Answer key for graders: Strong answers identify at minimum: (1) Rereading is a low-utility strategy that produces fluency without retrieval ability — Marcus will feel prepared but won't be. (2) Starting review 3 days before a 6-hour session violates spacing principles. (3) The plan has no retrieval practice — no blank-page recall, no flashcards, no practice questions. Prescription should include: Begin with a blank-page recall of everything he remembers from three weeks ago to diagnose gaps. Prioritize retrieval practice over rereading. Divide time across the three days rather than concentrating it today. If possible, make Anki cards from the gaps identified. Practice retrieval with practice questions from past exams rather than reviewing notes.
Question 22. Amara is explaining to a skeptical friend why she has started testing herself rather than rereading. Her friend says: "But retrieval practice makes no sense — if I test myself and get things wrong, I've just practiced the wrong answer. I'd be better off just rereading so I get the correct information every time." How should Amara respond?
Answer key for graders: Strong answers address: (1) Getting something wrong and then looking up the correct answer is actually more effective than passive exposure to the correct answer — the error creates a "prediction error" signal that enhances subsequent encoding. (2) Retrieval practice with feedback is more effective than retrieval practice alone, but even retrieval practice without feedback outperforms rereading in well-designed studies. (3) The feeling that rereading is "getting the correct information" confuses exposure with encoding — seeing the correct information and being able to produce it later are different things. (4) Optionally: the "hypercorrection effect" — errors on high-confidence items that get corrected are actually remembered better than correct responses.
Question 23. A student tells you: "I studied for six hours last night and I still failed the quiz. I just don't have a good memory." Using the concepts from Chapters 2 and 6, what is a more accurate diagnosis of what may have gone wrong, and how would you advise her?
Answer key for graders: Strong answers challenge the "I don't have a good memory" attribution by applying: (1) Metacognitive miscalibration — the student likely felt she learned the material because of the fluency illusion produced by long review sessions; her prediction of good performance was based on familiarity, not retrievability. (2) The distinction between retrieval strength and storage strength — six hours of study may have produced high retrieval strength that decayed before the quiz, or may have produced familiarity without storage strength if it was primarily passive review. (3) Poor strategy selection — six hours of the wrong strategy does not produce the outcomes of six hours of the right strategy. Advice: switch to retrieval practice, calibrate regularly, and do not confuse effort with effective strategy.
Question 24. Design a one-week study plan for learning and retaining the 30 most important vocabulary words for a foreign language exam in 10 days. Your plan must explicitly apply at least three principles from Chapters 7–12.
Answer key for graders: This is an open-ended design question. Strong answers include: Day 1–2: Encode the 30 words using dual coding (verbal + visual associations) or keyword method. Create Anki cards or physical flashcards. Day 3: First retrieval practice session — cover answers, attempt to recall. Check cards you missed. Day 4: Review missed cards using generation/self-testing. Day 5: Interleave retrieval of vocabulary with a brief writing exercise using the words in sentences (interleaving principle). Day 6: Spaced review — a full deck test on all 30 cards. Separate known from unknown. Day 7: Review only unknown or uncertain cards. Day 8: Full recall test again. Days 9–10: Light retrieval review. Explicitly name: retrieval practice (closed-book recall), spaced repetition (gaps between review sessions), interleaving (mixing review with production), elaboration (using words in sentences).
SECTION C: Essay (20 points, 10 points each)
Answer each essay in 300–400 words. Essays are evaluated on: (a) conceptual accuracy, (b) synthesis of multiple course concepts, (c) quality of argument and specific evidence, and (d) original critical thinking.
Essay 25. The "desirable difficulties" framework proposes that conditions that impair performance during practice often enhance long-term learning. Using this framework as a unifying lens, discuss three specific techniques from Chapters 7–12 and explain why each is a desirable difficulty. Then address this objection: "If these techniques feel harder, students will be demotivated to use them. Shouldn't we design learning to be as enjoyable as possible?"
Grading rubric: - 3 techniques accurately described with their research basis: 4 pts - Each technique correctly identified as a desirable difficulty with correct mechanism: 3 pts - Substantive engagement with the motivation objection (not dismissal): 2 pts - Original synthesis or insight beyond what the chapter states: 1 pt
Key concepts expected: retrieval practice (storage strengthening through effortful retrieval), spaced repetition (retrieval against forgetting), interleaving (discrimination demands). Motivation objection: the Kornell & Bjork finding that learners prefer less effective strategies is real; the response requires addressing not just "why they should" but "how to maintain motivation while using harder strategies" (e.g., growth mindset framing, tracking long-term improvements, reframing difficulty as signal of productive learning).
Essay 26. Compare and contrast the fluency illusion and the illusion of knowing. Then explain how metacognitive accuracy — the ability to accurately gauge one's own learning — can be improved through study practice choices. Your essay should reference at least three specific concepts from the first six chapters.
Grading rubric: - Clear, accurate distinction between fluency illusion and illusion of knowing: 3 pts - Correct identification of the cognitive mechanism for each: 2 pts - Three specific techniques for improving metacognitive accuracy: 3 pts - Coherence and quality of synthesis argument: 2 pts
Key concepts expected: Fluency illusion = recognition familiarity mistaken for retrievability (specifically from repeated exposure to the same material). Illusion of knowing = belief that you understand a concept when your understanding is actually superficial or incorrect. Both are forms of metacognitive miscalibration. Improvement strategies: retrieval practice (exposes gaps between recognition and recall), delayed post-reading blank-page recall, prediction + performance comparison cycles, elaborative interrogation (generates explanations that surface shallow understanding).
SECTION D: Progressive Project Reflection (10 points)
Question 27. Write a 200-word reflection on your Progressive Project so far. Address: - Which technique from Chapters 7–12 have you most consistently applied to your project? - Provide one specific, concrete example of how you applied it. - What result — expected or unexpected — have you observed? - What is the greatest challenge you have faced in implementing evidence-based practice, and what have you done or will you do to address it?
Grading note: This section is graded on specificity, honesty, and evidence of genuine technique application — not on the impressiveness of progress or on claiming that everything has worked perfectly. A student who honestly describes a technique that didn't work as expected and explains why (with course concepts) demonstrates more learning than one who reports unqualified success.
Instructor note on returning midterms: Return the midterm at the beginning of the next class session. Before distributing, ask students to predict which questions they got wrong — this is itself a retrieval and metacognition exercise. After distributing, spend 15 minutes on the two most-missed questions. Do not simply provide the correct answers: ask students to explain why the incorrect answers were incorrect. This converts the midterm return from a passive grading event into a high-value learning session.