Chapter 30 — Quiz
26 questions. Answers and explanations are in the instructor guide.
1. The appealable amount on a denied line is:
- A. The charge
- B. The allowed amount
- C. The plan payment
- D. The patient responsibility
2. Submitting a corrected claim when you meant to appeal can, at some payers:
- A. Speed the appeal
- B. Forfeit the appeal rights attached to the original determination
- C. Extend the filing window
- D. Have no effect
3. Account 10-5502's CARC 197 denial was correctly handled by:
- A. A level-one appeal
- B. A peer-to-peer demand
- C. A phone call, four more documented weeks, and resubmission
- D. External review
4. The one timely filing (CO-29) denial worth appealing is the one with:
- A. A large dollar amount
- B. A sympathetic patient
- C. Proof the claim was filed on time, such as a payer acknowledgment
- D. A signed provider attestation
5. An appeal's request should read most like:
- A. "We respectfully request review of this claim"
- B. "Reprocess line 1 and pay at the contracted allowed amount of \$128.40"
- C. "Please review all claims for this patient"
- D. "We dispute this denial in the strongest terms"
6. In the six-part letter, the standard comes before the demonstration because:
- A. Payers require it
- B. A reviewer who has read the rule reads your facts as evidence rather than as a story
- C. It makes the letter longer
- D. The facts are confidential
7. The Encounter's appeal cited exactly three documents:
- A. The note, the CMS-1500, and the 835
- B. The note, the NCCI Policy Manual, and the payer's own published policy
- C. The note, the LCD, and the fee schedule
- D. The chart, the contract, and the state statute
8. Only 10 of the appeal's 31 minutes were spent drafting, because:
- A. The letter was short
- B. Only the demonstration is new work; the citations live in a maintained paragraph library
- C. The biller was experienced
- D. The payer's portal is fast
9. "Constructing an argument" differs from "constructing a record" in that constructing an argument:
- A. Requires a physician's signature
- B. Uses only facts already documented, arranged so their consequence is visible
- C. Adds an addendum to the note
- D. Is only allowed at level two
10. A post-denial addendum asserting exactly the disputed element is dangerous because:
- A. It is illegible
- B. Amendments are dated and attributed, and a reviewer will discount the note — or refer the file
- C. It restarts timely filing
- D. It requires the patient's consent
11. Commercial appeal windows run from:
- A. The date of service
- B. The date the claim was filed
- C. The date of the determination being appealed
- D. The end of the calendar year
12. For a self-funded plan, the appeal framework is:
- A. State insurance law
- B. ERISA and the DOL claims-procedure regulation
- C. The state external review statute
- D. The Medicare five levels
13. Under ERISA, appeal rights belong to:
- A. The provider
- B. The state
- C. The plan participant — the provider typically acts as authorized representative
- D. The TPA
14. The five levels of Medicare appeal, in order, are:
- A. Reconsideration, redetermination, ALJ, Council, judicial review
- B. Redetermination, reconsideration, ALJ, Council, judicial review
- C. Redetermination, ALJ, reconsideration, Council, judicial review
- D. Peer-to-peer, redetermination, reconsideration, ALJ, judicial review
15. The redetermination is decided by:
- A. The QIC
- B. The MAC, by staff not involved in the initial determination
- C. OMHA
- D. The Appeals Council
16. The filing windows for levels 1 and 2 are, respectively:
- A. 60 and 60 days
- B. 120 and 180 days
- C. 180 and 120 days
- D. 90 and 90 days
17. An amount-in-controversy requirement first appears at:
- A. Redetermination
- B. Reconsideration
- C. The ALJ hearing
- D. Judicial review only
18. The evidence rule at reconsideration says:
- A. Evidence may be added at any level
- B. Present all evidence by the reconsideration; later evidence may be excluded absent good cause
- C. Only the beneficiary may submit evidence
- D. The QIC gathers its own evidence
19. "Escalation" in the Medicare ladder means:
- A. Complaining to the MAC's supervisor
- B. Moving the appeal to the next level when the current level misses its decision timeframe
- C. Adding interest to the claim
- D. Filing in state court
20. The peer-to-peer call should be made by:
- A. The biller
- B. The practice manager
- C. The treating physician
- D. The payer's provider-relations representative
21. The prep-sheet item practices most often skip is:
- A. The reference number
- B. The gap, named — what the reviewer will say is missing
- C. The callback number
- D. The date of service
22. External review by an IRO decides questions of:
- A. Contract pricing
- B. Timely filing
- C. Medical judgment — necessity, level of care, experimental status
- D. Claim formatting
23. The external review request window is generally:
- A. 30 days
- B. 60 days
- C. Four months from the final internal adverse determination
- D. One year
24. When a Medicare Advantage plan upholds its own denial at the plan level, the case is:
- A. Closed
- B. Forwarded automatically to an independent review entity
- C. Sent to the state insurance department
- D. Converted to a Part B appeal
25. The appeal log's two calendars are:
- A. Fiscal and calendar year
- B. Your filing deadlines and the payer's decision deadlines
- C. The provider's and the patient's
- D. Submission and posting
26. An appeal is resolved when:
- A. The letter is mailed
- B. The payer confirms receipt
- C. The favorable decision letter arrives
- D. The money posts on a remittance and the outcome flows back to the denial log