Chapter 4 Further Reading: The Language of Desire
Foundational Texts
Buss, David M. The Evolution of Desire: Strategies of Human Mating (Revised ed., 2003). Basic Books. The most accessible and comprehensive statement of the evolutionary psychology approach to human mating. Buss synthesizes his cross-cultural survey research (37 cultures) with laboratory findings on sex differences in jealousy, short-term versus long-term mating strategies, and mate preference hierarchies. Essential reading for understanding what evolutionary psychology actually claims — as opposed to its pop-culture caricature. Recommended approach: read critically, attend carefully to the distinction between statistical averages and claims about individuals, and note where Buss himself acknowledges limitations. Best read alongside Illouz (below) for a constructionist counterpoint.
Illouz, Eva. Why Love Hurts: A Sociological Explanation (2012). Polity Press. Illouz's most focused and accessible work. She argues that contemporary romantic suffering is structurally produced by the intersection of capitalism, feminism, and the "therapeutic culture" of the 20th century — not by individual psychological failures. Her analysis of how market logic has restructured intimacy is one of the most important contributions to the sociology of desire in the past two decades. Particularly relevant for this chapter's discussion of social constructionism and the commodification of intimacy. Note: Illouz writes beautifully but densely; plan to read slowly.
On Gender, Power, and Desire
Butler, Judith. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity (1990; 30th Anniversary Edition, 2020). Routledge. The foundational text of gender performativity theory. Butler argues that gender is not an expression of a prior biological or social essence but is constituted through the repeated performance of gender norms. The book is genuinely difficult — it was written for a specialist audience and does not pull its philosophical punches. For students new to Butler, the prefaces to later editions are much more accessible than the main text. A secondary source: Sara Salih's Judith Butler (Routledge Critical Thinkers series) provides an excellent guided introduction.
Rich, Adrienne. "Compulsory Heterosexuality and Lesbian Existence" (1980). Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 5(4), 631–660. A landmark essay that introduced the concept of "compulsory heterosexuality" — the argument that heterosexuality is not a freely chosen sexual orientation but a social institution that coercively structures women's lives, sexuality, and relationships. Influential on feminist theory, queer theory, and the sociology of desire. Accessible, politically forceful, and historically important. Freely available online through most university library databases.
On Intersectionality and Racialized Desire
Crenshaw, Kimberlé. "Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence Against Women of Color" (1991). Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299. The paper that extended Crenshaw's legal intersectionality framework beyond anti-discrimination law to broader questions of identity and power. More accessible than the original 1989 paper, and directly relevant to the application of intersectionality to desire and relationships. Crenshaw writes with exceptional clarity for a legal scholar; this is a text that repays careful reading.
hooks, bell. All About Love: New Visions (2000). William Morrow. hooks approaches love as a political and ethical practice, not merely a feeling. Her analysis of how patriarchy, capitalism, and racial inequality distort our capacity for love and intimacy is both personal and rigorous. More accessible than most of the academic texts on this list, and particularly valuable for integrating the intersectional dimensions of desire into a broader ethical framework.
On Sexual Fluidity and Queer Theory
Diamond, Lisa M. Sexual Fluidity: Understanding Women's Love and Desire (2008). Harvard University Press. The book-length account of Diamond's landmark 10-year longitudinal study of women's sexual attraction. Diamond found that many women's patterns of attraction shifted significantly over the decade of the study, often in ways that crossed conventional categorical boundaries. She argues that sexual fluidity — variability in attraction patterns over time — is a genuine feature of female sexuality that categorical models cannot capture. Essential reading for anyone who wants to understand why static orientation categories may be inadequate. Diamond's writing is accessible and her data are presented with admirable transparency.
Sedgwick, Eve Kosofsky. Epistemology of the Closet (1990; updated preface 2008). University of California Press. One of the foundational texts of queer theory. Sedgwick argues that the heterosexual/homosexual binary has been one of the defining — and defining-but-unstable — categorizations of modern Western culture, and that understanding this instability is essential to understanding a wide range of cultural and social phenomena. Challenging but transformative. For students new to queer theory, Chapter 1 ("Axiomatic") provides the clearest entry point.
On Research Methodology
Henrich, Joseph, Steven Heine, & Ara Norenzayan. "The Weirdest People in the World?" (2010). Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2–3), 61–83. The paper that introduced the WEIRD acronym and made the case that behavioral science had systematically oversampled from Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, Democratic populations. Directly relevant to the methodological critiques of evolutionary psychology raised in this chapter. The paper is a classic methodological intervention that changed how researchers think about generalizability. Freely available as a preprint.
Further reading selections were chosen to represent a genuine diversity of methodological traditions and theoretical orientations — not to stack the deck toward any single framework. Students are encouraged to read across traditions, treating each text as a lens rather than a verdict.