Further Reading: Chapter 2
Mauboussin, Michael J. The Success Equation: Untangling Skill and Luck in Business, Sports, and Investing. Harvard Business Review Press, 2012. The essential text for Chapter 2. Mauboussin developed the luck-skill continuum and the deliberate-losing test, and he applies them systematically across domains. Required reading for anyone making decisions in competitive, luck-influenced fields.
Pluchino, Alessandro, Alessio Biondo, and Andrea Rapisarda. "Talent vs Luck: The Role of Randomness in Success and Failure." Advances in Complex Systems 21, nos. 3–4 (2018). The simulation paper discussed in the chapter. Available open-access. Worth reading the actual paper — the methodology is transparent and the results are thought-provoking.
Frank, Robert H. Success and Luck: Good Fortune and the Myth of Meritocracy. Princeton University Press, 2016. An economist's systematic argument for luck's underappreciated role in success. Rigorous but accessible. Particularly strong on why success tends to exaggerate itself (network effects, positive feedback loops) even when the initial advantage was partially luck.
Kahneman, Daniel. Thinking, Fast and Slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2011. Chapter 19 ("The Illusion of Understanding") and Chapter 20 ("The Illusion of Validity") are directly relevant to Chapter 2 — they explain why experts systematically overestimate the predictability and skill-dependence of outcomes in their domains.
Gladwell, Malcolm. Outliers: The Story of Success. Little, Brown and Company, 2008. More accessible than rigorous, but introduces the key themes (birthdate effects, 10,000-hour rule, cultural legacy) that make the luck-skill question concrete. Read alongside the primary sources Gladwell draws from for a more accurate picture.
Gross, Bill. "The Single Biggest Reason Why Start-ups Succeed." TED2015. The 6-minute TED talk summarizing Idealab's data on startup timing. Available at TED.com. A compelling empirical argument for luck (timing) as a dominant factor in entrepreneurial success.