Chapter 11: Key Takeaways
Quick Reference Summary
Possession quality matters more than possession quantity. Measure not just how much of the ball a team has, but what they do with it and where they do it.
Core Concepts
Possession Methods
| Method | Formula | Use Case |
|---|---|---|
| Pass-Based | $\frac{Passes_A}{Passes_A + Passes_B}$ | Event data analysis |
| Time-Based | $\frac{Time\_with\_ball_A}{Total\_time}$ | Broadcast statistics |
| Touch-Based | $\frac{Touches_A}{Touches_A + Touches_B}$ | Alternative measurement |
Possession Sequence
A continuous period of team control, ending when: - Opposing team gains possession - Play stops (out of bounds, foul) - Goal is scored
Essential Metrics
Field Position
| Metric | Formula | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| Average X | $\bar{X} = \frac{1}{n}\sum x_i$ | Higher = more attacking territory |
| Field Tilt | $\frac{Events_{attacking third}}{Total_{events}}$ | Proportion in final third |
| Territorial Index | $\frac{\bar{X}_{team} - \bar{X}_{opp}}{120} + 0.5$ | >0.5 = territorial advantage |
Possession Efficiency
| Metric | Formula | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| Shot Rate | $\frac{Shots}{Possession\_sequences}$ | Shots per possession |
| xG Efficiency | $\frac{xG}{Possession\_sequences}$ | Expected goals per possession |
| Dangerous Possession | $\frac{Events_{xT > threshold}}{Total\_events}$ | High-threat possession % |
Pressing Metrics
| Metric | Formula | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| PPDA | $\frac{Opp\_passes\_def\_third}{Def\_actions\_their\_third}$ | Lower = more pressing |
| High Turnovers | Regains where $x > 80$ | Ball wins in attacking third |
| Counter-Press Rate | $\frac{Quick\_regains}{Possession\_losses}$ | Immediate recovery success |
Typical Benchmarks
Possession Percentage
| Range | Typical Style |
|---|---|
| 30-40% | Counter-attacking |
| 40-50% | Balanced/Pragmatic |
| 50-60% | Controlled |
| 60%+ | Possession-dominant |
PPDA Thresholds
| PPDA | Pressing Intensity |
|---|---|
| < 8 | Very high press |
| 8-11 | High press |
| 11-14 | Medium press |
| > 14 | Low press / Deep block |
Field Position Benchmarks
| Avg X Position | Interpretation |
|---|---|
| < 45m | Defending deep |
| 45-55m | Balanced |
| > 55m | Territorial dominance |
Python Quick Reference
Calculate Possession
def calculate_possession(events_df, team_name):
team_passes = events_df[
(events_df['team'] == team_name) &
(events_df['type'] == 'Pass') &
(events_df['pass_outcome'].isna())
]
total_passes = events_df[
(events_df['type'] == 'Pass') &
(events_df['pass_outcome'].isna())
]
return len(team_passes) / len(total_passes)
Calculate PPDA
def calculate_ppda(events_df, pressing_team):
opponent = get_opponent(events_df, pressing_team)
opp_passes = events_df[
(events_df['team'] == opponent) &
(events_df['type'] == 'Pass') &
(events_df['location'].apply(lambda x: x[0] < 40 if isinstance(x, list) else False))
]
def_actions = events_df[
(events_df['team'] == pressing_team) &
(events_df['type'].isin(['Pressure', 'Tackle', 'Interception'])) &
(events_df['location'].apply(lambda x: x[0] > 80 if isinstance(x, list) else False))
]
return len(opp_passes) / len(def_actions) if len(def_actions) > 0 else float('inf')
Field Position
def field_position(events_df, team_name):
team_events = events_df[
(events_df['team'] == team_name) &
(events_df['location'].notna())
]
x_coords = [loc[0] for loc in team_events['location'] if isinstance(loc, list)]
return np.mean(x_coords)
Key Formulas Reference Card
Territorial Index
$$TI = \frac{\bar{X}_{team} - \bar{X}_{opponent}}{120} + 0.5$$
Field Tilt
$$Tilt = \frac{Events_{x > 80}}{Total\_events}$$
PPDA
$$PPDA = \frac{Opponent\_passes\_in\_their\_def\_third}{Your\_def\_actions\_in\_their\_def\_third}$$
Possession Efficiency
$$Efficiency = \frac{xG}{N_{possessions}}$$
xT-Weighted Possession
$$xT\_Poss = \sum_{e} xT(x_e, y_e)$$
The Possession Paradox
Key Insight
More possession ≠ more wins
Evidence
- France won World Cup 2018 with 49% average possession
- Teams with 50-60% possession don't win more than those with 40-50%
- Efficiency (xG per possession) matters more than volume
Implications
- Track possession quality, not just quantity
- Measure efficiency (shots/xG per possession sequence)
- Consider transition opportunities lost with high possession
- Adapt possession targets to opponent and situation
Style Classifications
| Style | PPDA | Def Line | Possession |
|---|---|---|---|
| High Press | < 9 | > 55m | Variable |
| Mid Press | 9-12 | 45-55m | 45-55% |
| Mid Block | 12-15 | 40-50m | 40-50% |
| Deep Block | > 15 | < 45m | 35-45% |
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- Equating possession with dominance: Territory matters more than possession
- Ignoring possession quality: Where > how much
- Overlooking transitions: Value of counter-attacks when not possessing
- Static analysis: Possession patterns change with game state
- Context blindness: Score, opponent, and match importance affect optimal possession
Practical Workflow
1. Data Preparation
Load events → Filter by team → Extract locations
2. Basic Metrics
Calculate possession % → Field position → Zone control
3. Efficiency Analysis
Identify sequences → Calculate shots/xG per sequence → Compare
4. Pressing Metrics
Calculate PPDA → High turnovers → Counter-pressing rate
5. Visualization
Heatmaps → Zone control maps → Flow diagrams
Applications Summary
| Application | Key Metrics | Use Case |
|---|---|---|
| Match analysis | Possession %, field position, efficiency | Post-match review |
| Style identification | PPDA, def line, possession quality | Scouting |
| Opponent preparation | Zone control, pressing triggers | Pre-match planning |
| Player evaluation | Possession retention, progression | Recruitment |
| Tactical adjustment | In-match possession changes | Coaching |
Next Chapter Preview
Part III: Player and Team Analysis extends these concepts to individual player contributions, beginning with defensive metrics that complement the attacking focus of possession analysis.