Appendix B: Key Studies Reference

Major studies discussed in this book, with citation, sample, key finding, and replication status.


Study Citation Sample Key Finding Replication Status Chapter
Barnum effect Forer (1949) 39 students Generic descriptions rated 4.26/5 accurate Extensively replicated 1
Press release exaggeration Sumner et al. (2014) 462 press releases 40% contained exaggerated claims Replicated pattern 2
Marshmallow test replication Watts, Duncan, & Quan (2018) 918 children Effect largely explained by SES Large-scale replication 2
Power posing Carney, Cuddy, & Yap (2010) 42 participants Hormonal changes from power poses Failed to replicate (Ranehill et al., 2015) 2
Open Science Collaboration OSC (2015) 100 studies replicated Only 36% replicated successfully Landmark study 3
Ego depletion RRR Hagger et al. (2016) 23 labs, 2,141 participants d = 0.04 (essentially zero) Failed to replicate 3, 27
Neuroscience seductive allure Weisberg et al. (2008) Multiple studies Irrelevant neuro-language increases credibility Replicated 11
Left-brain/right-brain Nielsen et al. (2013) 1,011 brain scans No hemispheric dominance in personality Replicated absence 11
Brain training (Lumosity) Owen et al. (2010) 11,000+ participants No far transfer from brain training Consistent with meta-analyses 11
Mozart Effect meta-analysis Pietschnig et al. (2010) Meta-analysis Very small effect, mood-driven, not Mozart-specific Meta-analytic summary 11
Learning styles review Pashler et al. (2008) Systematic review No support for meshing hypothesis Consistent null findings 12
Smartphone proximity Ward et al. (2017) Multiple experiments Phone presence reduces cognitive capacity Replicated 14
Social media and wellbeing Orben & Przybylski (2019) 350,000+ adolescents r ≈ 0.04 (very small) Large-scale analysis 21
Serotonin and depression Moncrieff et al. (2022) Umbrella review No consistent evidence for serotonin hypothesis Umbrella review of reviews 17
Antidepressant effectiveness Cipriani et al. (2018) 522 trials, 116,000+ All 21 drugs outperformed placebo Most comprehensive meta-analysis 17
ACEs study Felitti & Anda (1998) 17,337 adults Dose-response: more ACEs → higher health risk Replicated in multiple samples 19
Love languages psychometrics Bunt & Hazelwood (2017) Exploratory study Poor factor structure; matching not supported Limited independent testing 22
Similarity-attraction Montoya et al. (2008) Meta-analysis Similarity predicts attraction; complementarity doesn't Extensively replicated 23
Growth mindset (national) Yeager et al. (2019) 12,000+ students d = 0.03 overall; 0.10 for at-risk students Largest pre-registered study 26
Grit-conscientiousness overlap Credé et al. (2017) Meta-analysis r = 0.77–0.90 overlap Meta-analytic finding 27
Deliberate practice Macnamara et al. (2014) 88 studies Practice explains 1–26% depending on domain Meta-analytic finding 27
Habit formation Lally et al. (2010) 96 participants 18–254 days (median 66) The primary study on this question 28
Implementation intentions Gollwitzer & Sheeran (2006) Meta-analysis d = 0.65 for goal achievement Well-replicated 28
Positive visualization backfire Oettingen et al. (2001) Multiple studies Positive fantasy reduces effort and energy Replicated 29
Affirmation backfire Wood et al. (2009) Experimental Backfire for low self-esteem Replicated finding 29
Lie detection accuracy Bond & DePaulo (2006) 206 studies 54% accuracy (barely above chance) Meta-analytic finding 34
Criminal profiling accuracy Snook et al. (2007) Meta-analysis Profilers not better than non-profilers Meta-analytic finding 35
NLP review Witkowski (2010) 63 articles No evidence for NLP claims Consistent null findings 36