Affiliate disclosure
Book titles on this page link to Amazon. As an Amazon Associate, DataField.Dev earns from qualifying purchases — at no additional cost to you.
Further Reading: Chapter 5 — Multiple Qubits — Tensor Products, Entanglement, Bell States, and the Resource That Makes Quantum Computing Powerful
- Einstein, A., Podolsky, B., & Rosen, N. (1935). "Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?" Physical Review, 47, 777–780.
- Bell, J. S. (1964). "On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen Paradox." Physics Physique Fizika, 1, 195–200.
- Clauser, J. F., Horne, M. A., Shimony, A., & Holt, R. A. (1969). "Proposed Experiment to Test Local Hidden-Variable Theories." Physical Review Letters, 23, 880–884.
- Aspect, A., Grangier, P., & Roger, G. (1982). "Experimental Realization of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm Gedankenexperiment." Physical Review Letters, 49, 91–94.
- Hensen, B., et al. (2015). "Loophole-free Bell inequality violation using electron spins separated by 1.3 kilometres." Nature, 526, 682–686.
- Bennett, C. H., et al. (1993). "Teleporting an Unknown Quantum State via Dual Classical and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Channels." Physical Review Letters, 70, 1895–1899.
- Raussendorf, R., & Briegel, H. J. (2001). "A One-Way Quantum Computer." Physical Review Letters, 86, 5188–5191.
- Nielsen, M. A., & Chuang, I. L. (2010). Quantum Computation and Quantum Information, Chapters 1.3, 2.1, 2.5. Cambridge University Press.
- Horodecki, R., Horodecki, P., Horodecki, M., & Horodecki, K. (2009). "Quantum entanglement." Reviews of Modern Physics, 81, 865–942.
- Dür, W., Vidal, G., & Cirac, J. I. (2000). "Three qubits can be entangled in two inequivalent ways." Physical Review A, 62, 062314.