Appendix J: A Timeline

Dates for the results this book relies on. Chapter numbers point to where the book measures or uses each one — this is a reading path as much as a chronology.

Entries after roughly 2023 are close enough to the present that their significance is genuinely uncertain. They are included because the book cites them, not because history has settled.


Foundations (1980–1994)

Year Event Ch.
1980–82 Feynman and Manin argue quantum systems need quantum computers to simulate 1, 36
1982 No-cloning theorem (Wootters–Zurek, Dieks) 38
1984 BB84 (Bennett–Brassard) — quantum key distribution 38
1985 Deutsch defines the universal quantum computer 1, 20
1992 Deutsch–Jozsa — the first exponential black-box separation 20
1993 Teleportation proposed (Bennett et al.) 9
1994 Shor's algorithm — polynomial-time factoring 23
1994 Goemans–Williamson — 0.87856 MaxCut approximation 24, 37

★ Note the last two. They are the same year, and Chapter 37 measured QAOA losing 0–6 to the classical one. The algorithm quantum computing is most feared for and the algorithm that beats its near-term optimizer were published simultaneously.

Error correction and structure (1995–2000)

Year Event Ch.
1995 Shor's 9-qubit code — error correction is possible 25
1996 Steane code; CSS codes 25
1996 Grover's algorithm — quadratic unstructured search 21
1997 Threshold theorem (Aharonov–Ben-Or, Knill et al.) 15, 25
1997 Simon's algorithm — the template for Shor's 20
1998 Gottesman–Knill — Clifford circuits are classically simulable 11, 19
1998 First NMR demonstrations of small algorithms 1
2000 Kitaev's surface code framework matures 25

The long build (2001–2015)

Year Event Ch.
2001 Shor's algorithm factors 15 on NMR 23
2002 Bravyi–Kitaev fermionic mapping 36
2005 Aspuru-Guzik et al. — quantum chemistry via phase estimation 36
2005 Magic state distillation (Bravyi–Kitaev) 15
2008 HHL algorithm for linear systems 32
2012 Fowler et al. surface-code roadmap — the overhead numbers 15, 25
2012 Seeley–Richard–Love on Bravyi–Kitaev for electronic structure 36
2014 VQE (Peruzzo et al.) — designed for devices that cannot run QPE 24, 36
2014 QAOA (Farhi–Goldstone–Gutmann) 24, 37
2015 Aaronson, "Read the fine print" — the input/output problem stated plainly 32, 40

NISQ (2016–2022)

Year Event Ch.
2016 IBM puts a 5-qubit device on the public cloud 1, 12
2017 Reiher et al. FeMoco resource estimate 36
2018 Preskill names the NISQ era 1, 40
2018 Barren plateaus (McClean et al.) 16, 32
2019 Google's Sycamore supremacy claim; disputed almost immediately 14, 20
2019 Quantum Volume proposed as a device metric 30
2020 Classical shadows (Huang–Kueng–Preskill) 35
2020 Zhou et al. on QAOA angle transfer 37
2021 Stilck França–García-Patrón — noise limits on variational optimization 37
2021 Von Burg et al. — a much improved catalysis estimate 36
2022 Huang et al. — proven advantage in learning from experiments 35, 40
2022 Gonthier et al. — measurement as the roadblock in chemistry 36
2022 SIKE broken classically — a NIST post-quantum candidate falls 38
2022 Schuld–Killoran — is advantage the right goal for QML? 32, 40

Recent (2023–2026)

Year Event Ch.
2023 Hoefler–Häner–Troyer — disentangling hype from practicality 40
2023–24 Below-threshold surface code demonstrations — adding qubits reduces logical error 25, 40
2024 NIST standardizes ML-KEM, ML-DSA, SLH-DSA (FIPS 203/204/205) 23, 38
2024 Qiskit 1.0; BackendV1 deprecated A, C
2025 Qiskit 2.0qiskit.pulse removed 31, A, C
2025–26 Devices past 1,000 physical qubits; no change to this book's scorecard 39, 40

★ That last row is the one to sit with. Qubit counts rose by an order of magnitude across this book's writing, and not one of Chapter 40's six head-to-head comparisons changed hands. Width was never the binding constraint — Chapter 15's T-gate overhead, Chapter 24's shot budget, and Chapter 39's queue all were, and none of them is measured in qubits.

What to watch

Four things whose movement would actually change the scorecard:

  1. Below-threshold error correction at scale. The 2023–24 demonstrations are the most important experimental progress in the field, and they are on the thing that gates everything else.
  2. A real-time decoder meeting the latency budget. Chapter 40 §40.1's highest-demand skill.
  3. An instance family where a classical guarantee is tight and quantum does better. Chapter 37 §37.9 notes none has been demonstrated on hardware.
  4. A learning task with quantum input and a demonstrated separation on real data. Chapter 35's surviving case.

Not on the list: qubit count, and any announcement whose headline number is one.


See also: Chapter 1 (the landscape), Chapter 40 (what it adds up to), Appendix H (the ecosystem this produced), the bibliography (every source cited).