A one-page reference. Reread this before an exam, or before you budget any launch.
The one idea
Orbit is sideways, not up. An orbit is a horizontal speed, not an altitude. A satellite falls
continuously toward Earth while the curved surface drops away beneath it at the same rate — perpetual
free fall that keeps missing the ground. Height is cheap; the $\sim 7.8\ \text{km/s}$ of sideways speed
is the whole cost.
The key equations (with symbols and units)
Equation
Use it to find
Symbols
$v_{\text{orbit}} = \sqrt{\mu/r}$
circular orbital speed (km/s)
$\mu = 3.986\times10^5\ \text{km}^3/\text{s}^2$; $r$ = orbital radius (km)
$\text{drop} = d^2/(2R)$
how far Earth curves away over horizontal distance $d$
$R$ = Earth radius; matches free-fall drop $\tfrac12 g t^2$
The launch delta-v budget to LEO (memorize the stack)
Line
Approx.
Note
Orbital speed (LEO)
~7.8 km/s
$\sqrt{\mu/r}$; lower orbits are faster
Gravity loss
~1.5 km/s
range 1.2–1.6; the big thief
Drag loss
~0.1 km/s
small; $\rho$ and $v$ peak at opposite times
Launch delta-v (no credit)
~9.4 km/s
what Chapters 1 & 3 quoted
Earth-rotation credit
−(up to 0.46) km/s
eastward, equatorial; penalty if westward
Definitions at a glance
Term
One-line meaning
Gravity turn
Lift off vertical, kick over a few degrees, then hold thrust along velocity and let gravity bend the path to horizontal.
Pitch program
The scheduled pitch-angle-vs-time (or altitude) that steers the vehicle from vertical to horizontal.
Gravity loss
Delta-v lost because part of the thrust fights gravity during the climb: $\int g\sin\gamma\,dt$.
Drag loss
Delta-v lost to aerodynamic drag during atmospheric ascent: $\int (D/m)\,dt$.
Ascent trajectory
The full path + pitch/throttle program from lift-off to insertion; the optimum minimizes total losses within structural limits.
Suborbital
Reaches space (~100 km) but not orbital speed; a ballistic arc that falls back.
Orbital flight
Has the ~7.8 km/s sideways speed to keep falling around Earth without descending.
Decision aid — "which idea applies?"
You want…
Use
the sideways speed for a circular orbit
$v = \sqrt{\mu/r}$
the extra delta-v beyond orbital speed
add gravity loss (~1.5) + drag loss (~0.1)
the gravity-loss rate right now
$g\sin\gamma$ (max straight up, zero horizontal)
the launch-site benefit
subtract $0.465\cos\phi$ km/s (eastward)
whether one stage can do it
compare $e^{\Delta v/v_e}$ with the $\sim 12.5$ ceiling (Ch. 3)
Common pitfalls
Pitfall
Reality
"Space starts at 100 km, so just climb 100 km."
Reaching space is a ~1.4 km/s hop; orbit is ~7.8 km/s sideways — ~30× the energy.
"Go straight up; it's the shortest path."
Straight up maximizes gravity loss ($\sin\gamma = 1$) and leaves zero orbital velocity.
"Rise slowly to save fuel."
The hover trap: thrust-to-weight ≈ 1 burns delta-v at rate $g$ for zero speed. Climb briskly (T/W ~1.2–1.5).
"Astronauts are beyond gravity."
Gravity at 400 km is ~90% of surface; they float because they're in free fall, orbiting.
"Drag is the big loss near Mach 20."
Drag is ~0.1 km/s; when the rocket is fast the air is nearly gone. Gravity is the big loss.
Numbers worth memorizing
Orbital speed (LEO) $\approx 7.8\ \text{km/s}$; launch delta-v to LEO $\approx 9.4\ \text{km/s}$.
Gravity loss $\sim 1.5\ \text{km/s}$; drag loss $\sim 0.1\ \text{km/s}$.
Earth-rotation credit up to $\sim 0.46\ \text{km/s}$ (eastward, equatorial).
Reaching orbit is $\sim 30\times$ the energy of a 100 km suborbital hop.
The launch mass ratio (~19–23 at $v_e = 3$ km/s) exceeds the single-stage ceiling → staging is
mandatory.
Mission / astrotools additions this chapter
MDR: added the launch delta-v line (~9.4 km/s to LEO) as the top of the delta-v budget; noted it
is the launch vehicle's job, separate from the spacecraft's own maneuvers.