Chapter 31 — Quiz
Twenty-five self-check questions on reading and critiquing photographs: slow looking, the four-stage vocabulary, craft versus taste, intent versus effect, and giving and receiving critique. A mix of multiple choice, true/false (with justification), short answer, and "what's wrong with this critique?" seeing questions. Answer everything before opening the key at the bottom, and for the justification questions, write the reason — a right answer with a wrong reason still counts as not yet understood.
Multiple choice
Q1. Slow looking is best described as: - A) Using a slow shutter speed to convey motion - B) Examining an image deliberately and at length before forming any judgment - C) Editing an image slowly and carefully - D) Looking at many images quickly to find the best one
Q2. In the slow-looking route, the chapter insists you visit all four edges and corners because: - A) Edges are where the most expensive lenses show their quality - B) The rule of thirds lives at the edges - C) Most fixable mistakes (distractions, awkward crops, lines leading the eye out) hide there - D) The center of the frame doesn't matter
Q3. The four stages of critique, in their correct order, are: - A) Judgment → interpretation → analysis → description - B) Description → analysis → interpretation → judgment - C) Analysis → description → judgment → interpretation - D) Interpretation → judgment → description → analysis
Q4. Which stage of critique is the objective inventory of what is literally in the frame, with no opinion? - A) Analysis - B) Interpretation - C) Description - D) Judgment
Q5. "The diagonal of the railing leads the eye to the figure, which sits on the upper-left power point, but the bright window behind competes for attention." This sentence is an example of: - A) Description - B) Analysis - C) Interpretation - D) Judgment
Q6. A craft problem, as the chapter defines it, is one that: - A) Only a professional would ever notice - B) Works against what the photograph is clearly trying to do, and is fixable - C) Is purely a matter of personal preference - D) Can only be solved with better equipment
Q7. The single test for sorting a craft issue from a taste issue is: - A) "Does it cost money to fix?" - B) "Would most people on social media agree?" - C) "Could a skilled photographer disagree with me and still be right?" - D) "Is it in focus?"
Q8. Taste laundering is: - A) Cleaning up the color grade of an image - B) Dressing a personal preference as an objective rule (often with "never" or "always") - C) Asking the photographer what they intended - D) Removing distractions from the edges of a frame
Q9. In the chapter's terms, a critique judges the photograph's _, not the photographer's _. - A) intent; effect - B) effect; intent - C) equipment; skill - D) popularity; sincerity
Q10. The most powerful single tool for critiquing your own work honestly is: - A) A more expensive monitor - B) Putting time between yourself and the image - C) Showing it to as many people as possible immediately - D) Comparing it to a famous photograph
Q11. When you receive a critique you disagree with, the chapter's advice is: - A) Always act on it — the critic knows best - B) Ignore it entirely — only your vision matters - C) Weigh it; you are the final editor (listen to all, obey none), but heed any note several viewers give - D) Explain in detail what you actually meant
Q12. Which of these is the best (most useful) critique note? - A) "The background is distracting." - B) "Nice shot!" - C) "The bright window at top-left pulls the eye off the face — clone it down or recompose to exclude it." - D) "I don't really like it."
Q13. Visual literacy is: - A) Knowing the names of all camera brands - B) The ability to read images critically and articulate how they construct meaning - C) Having good eyesight - D) The number of photographs you've taken
Q14. Why does the chapter insist you write critiques down rather than just think them? - A) To create a portfolio of writing for clients - B) Because writing forces vague seeing into specific language, where the learning happens - C) Because instructors require it - D) Writing is faster than looking
True / False — and say why
For each, mark True or False and write one sentence of justification.
Q15. Your first, four-second impression of a photograph is reliable information about the photograph's quality.
Q16. Interpretation is allowed to be opinion, as long as the opinion is anchored to concrete evidence in the frame.
Q17. A centered subject is always a beginner's mistake.
Q18. When several independent viewers, separately, report the same unintended effect from your image, that is a signal worth heeding regardless of your intent.
Q19. Receiving critique well means rebuilding your image to satisfy each piece of feedback you're given.
Q20. Self-flagellation ("it's all garbage") is a more honest form of self-critique than defensiveness.
Short answer
Q21. In two or three sentences, explain the difference between intent and effect, and state which one a critique should judge and why.
Q22. Name the six steps of the slow-looking route from Figure 31.1, in order.
Q23. Give one reason that "ask a question" beats "explain what you meant" when you're on the receiving end of a critique.
What's wrong with this critique? (Seeing questions)
Q24. A workshop participant reads an image and says, in full: "Yeah, it's good. I like it. The colors are nice. Eight out of ten." Using the chapter's framework, explain precisely what is wrong with this as a critique — name what's missing and why it's useless to the photographer.
Q25. Read this Described Photograph, then answer below it.
FIGURE Q31.1 — "Kitchen still life" [constructed teaching example]
THE FRAME A white bowl of lemons sits center-frame on a wooden table; behind it, a cluttered counter
with a dish rack, a roll of paper towels, and a bright window blown to pure white. A bottle
at the right edge is cut in half by the frame. The lemons are sharp; the background is also
fairly sharp.
THE LIGHT Hard late-morning sun straight through the window behind the bowl, backlighting the scene;
the front of the lemons falls into shadow; the window is the brightest thing by far.
THE MOMENT Static still life; no action.
THE CHOICES Shot straight-on at table height; small aperture keeping most of the scene in focus; bowl
centered; nothing moved or removed before shooting.
THE EFFECT The eye is pulled to the blown-white window, not the lemons; the cluttered counter and the
half-cut bottle compete for attention; the lemons themselves are underlit and flat.
The photographer's stated intent was "a clean, glowing study of lemons in beautiful light." Write a brief four-stage critique (a sentence or two per stage), and in your judgment, name the two most fixable craft problems and prescribe a re-shoot for each. Then identify one thing in your critique that would be taste, not craft.
Answer Key
Click to reveal answers and explanations
**Q1 — B.** Slow looking is deliberate, lengthy examination *before* judgment. The point is to defeat the brain's four-second "gist" verdict. (§31.1) **Q2 — C.** The center grabs the eye automatically; the edges must be visited on purpose, and that's exactly where distractions, awkward crops, and eye-leading-out lines — the fixable mistakes — hide. (§31.1) **Q3 — B.** Description → analysis → interpretation → judgment. You climb in order and never skip to the verdict. (§31.2) **Q4 — C.** Description is the objective inventory — facts only, no meaning, no verdict. (§31.2) **Q5 — B.** Analysis: it describes how the visual elements *relate* (leading line, power point, competing brightness) without yet assigning meaning or a verdict. (§31.2) **Q6 — B.** A craft problem works against the image's evident goal and is fixable — a skilled photographer would agree it's a flaw. (§31.3) **Q7 — C.** The honesty test: if a skilled photographer could disagree and still be right, it's taste; if not, it's craft. (§31.3) **Q8 — B.** Taste laundering is presenting a preference as an objective rule; the tell is "never"/"always" attached to a creative choice. (§31.3) **Q9 — B.** A critique judges the photograph's *effect* (what a stranger sees), not the photographer's *intent* (what they meant). (§31.4) **Q10 — B.** Time. The emotional cloud around your own image evaporates with distance, letting you see the effect rather than your intent. (§31.4) **Q11 — C.** You are the final editor — weigh critique, act on craft notes you can now see, keep your choice on taste; but a note repeated by several independent viewers signals a real, intent-defeating effect. (§31.5) **Q12 — C.** It's specific (names the exact element), actionable (gives the fix), and points at a real craft problem. A, B, and D are vague or empty. (§31.3, §31.5) **Q13 — B.** Visual literacy is reading images critically and articulating how they make meaning — a skill that also makes you harder to manipulate. (§31.6) **Q14 — B.** Writing forces vague seeing into specific language, and the specificity is where the learning is; it also creates a record of your developing eye. (§31.6) **Q15 — False.** The first impression is information about *you* (your gist reaction), not yet about the photograph; the "why" behind the reaction — the only learnable part — requires slow looking. (§31.1) **Q16 — True.** Interpretation is grounded opinion: it's allowed and necessary, but every interpretive claim must point back to concrete evidence in the frame, or it's mere projection. (§31.2) **Q17 — False.** A centered subject is a common beginner's default error, but it's a deliberate, powerful choice in a symmetrical composition; intent determines whether it's craft flaw or strength. (§31.3, §31.4) **Q18 — True.** One reaction is a data point; the same unintended effect from several independent viewers is a signal that your image is doing something you didn't intend — worth heeding even against your attachment to the intent. (§31.5) **Q19 — False.** That produces work with no spine. Receiving critique well means *weighing* it — listen to all, obey none, decide for yourself — acting on genuine craft notes and keeping your choices on taste. (§31.5) **Q20 — False.** Both are ego traps and both prevent honest looking: pride refuses to find the flaw, despair refuses to find the success. Neither lets you see the photograph as it actually is. (§31.4) **Q21.** *Intent* is what you were trying to do (the feeling/plan/memory in your head); *effect* is what the photograph actually does to a viewer with none of your context. A critique judges the **effect**, because the effect is the only thing that travels to the viewer — your intent doesn't ride along with the image. (§31.4) **Q22.** (1) First landing — where the eye goes first; (2) the travel — where it goes second, third, the path; (3) the edges — all four edges and corners; (4) the light — direction and quality; (5) the brightest/darkest points; (6) the second look — what you missed. Verdict only after all six. (§31.1) **Q23.** Explaining defends your *intent*, which is exactly the thing that failed to travel to the viewer; asking ("what made it feel that way?") extracts more information about the *effect* — the one thing outside critique can give you that you can't see yourself. (§31.5) **Q24.** It's all *judgment* and no description, analysis, or interpretation — it skips the three floors of looking that make a verdict useful. "I like it / the colors are nice / 8 out of 10" is unfalsifiable and unteachable: it tells the photographer nothing they can act on, names no specific strength to repeat and no specific flaw to fix, and doesn't separate craft from taste. A useful critique climbs all four stages and points every claim at the frame. (§31.2, §31.5) **Q25.** A model response: - *Description:* A centered white bowl of lemons on a wooden table, backlit by a blown-white window; cluttered counter behind; a bottle cut in half at the right edge; most of the scene in focus. - *Analysis:* The brightest point (the window) sits behind the subject and out-competes it; the busy background and half-cut bottle add competing visual weight; backlight leaves the front of the lemons underlit and flat; everything's in focus, so nothing is prioritized. - *Interpretation:* Rather than a clean glowing study, the image reads as a snapshot of a kitchen counter — the eye goes to the window and the clutter, not the lemons; the intended subject is lost. - *Judgment (with the two most fixable craft problems):* It fails its stated intent, but the failures are fixable. **(1) The blown window/backlight:** re-shoot with the light coming from the *side* (turn the bowl, or shoot 90° to the window) so the lemons are modeled and the window is no longer the brightest thing in the frame. **(2) The cluttered, in-focus background and half-cut bottle:** clear the counter (or shoot against a plain surface), remove the bottle from the edge, and open the aperture / move closer to throw the background soft so the lemons dominate. — *Taste, not craft:* whether the final image should be warm or cool, or whether the lemons "should" be centered versus on a power point in the cleaned-up version, is a preference; the centered composition could be made to work deliberately. (§31.2–§31.4; ties to Chapter 6 composition and Chapter 5 light direction.)Topics to review by question
| If you missed… | Review |
|---|---|
| Q1, Q2, Q15 | §31.1 — slow looking and the looking route |
| Q3, Q4, Q5, Q14, Q16, Q21 | §31.2 — the four-stage vocabulary |
| Q6, Q7, Q8, Q12, Q17 | §31.3 — craft vs. taste |
| Q9, Q10, Q20, Q22 | §31.4 — critiquing your own work; intent vs. effect |
| Q11, Q18, Q19, Q23 | §31.5 — giving and receiving critique |
| Q13 | §31.6 — building a practice; visual literacy |
| Q24, Q25 | §§31.2–31.4 applied — full critique in practice |