Case Study 1: The 2019-20 Milwaukee Bucks - Elite Net Rating and Giannis Antetokounmpo's On/Off Dominance
Executive Summary
The 2019-20 Milwaukee Bucks achieved one of the best regular-season Net Ratings in NBA history (+10.7), built around Giannis Antetokounmpo's historically dominant on/off statistics. This case study examines how plus-minus and on/off analysis captured the Bucks' excellence, how individual on/off differentials revealed Giannis's impact, and what limitations these metrics exposed when the Bucks fell short in the playoffs.
Background: Building an Elite Team Around One Player
The Bucks' Construction Philosophy
The 2019-20 Bucks were deliberately constructed to maximize Giannis's strengths:
- Perimeter shooting around Giannis: Spacing for driving lanes
- Rim protection behind him: Brook Lopez anchoring defense
- Versatile defenders: Switch capability on perimeter
- Limited ball-handling burden: Giannis as primary creator
The Statistical Foundation
| Team Metric | 2019-20 Value | League Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Offensive Rating | 112.6 | 6th |
| Defensive Rating | 101.9 | 1st |
| Net Rating | +10.7 | 1st |
| Pace | 103.3 | 10th |
The Bucks' dominance came primarily from defense - the best in the league by a significant margin.
Team Net Rating Analysis
Historical Context
| Team | Season | Net Rating | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-20 Milwaukee | Regular Season | +10.7 | Lost ECSF |
| 2016-17 Golden State | Regular Season | +11.6 | Won Championship |
| 2015-16 San Antonio | Regular Season | +10.3 | Lost WCSF |
| 2007-08 Boston | Regular Season | +10.3 | Won Championship |
The Bucks' Net Rating was historically elite, comparable to championship-caliber teams.
Component Breakdown
| Metric | Bucks | League Avg | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| ORtg | 112.6 | 110.6 | +2.0 |
| DRtg | 101.9 | 110.6 | -8.7 |
| Net Rtg | +10.7 | 0.0 | +10.7 |
Key Insight: The Bucks' advantage came 80% from defense (8.7 point defensive advantage) versus 20% from offense (2.0 point offensive advantage).
Giannis Antetokounmpo's On/Off Dominance
Raw On/Off Statistics
| Split | ORtg | DRtg | Net Rtg | Minutes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Giannis On | 115.2 | 99.4 | +15.8 | 2,142 |
| Giannis Off | 107.8 | 107.3 | +0.5 | 1,698 |
| Differential | +7.4 | -7.9 | +15.3 | - |
Interpretation
Giannis's +15.3 on/off differential was among the largest in the league, meaning: - The team was 15.3 points per 100 possessions better with him on court - His defensive impact (-7.9 DRtg) actually exceeded his offensive impact (+7.4 ORtg) - Without Giannis, the Bucks were barely above average (+0.5 Net Rtg)
Historical On/Off Comparisons
| Player | Season | On/Off Diff | Team Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| LeBron James | 2008-09 | +17.1 | Lost Finals |
| Kevin Garnett | 2003-04 | +16.3 | Lost Round 1 |
| Giannis | 2019-20 | +15.3 | Lost Round 2 |
| Chris Paul | 2008-09 | +14.8 | Lost Round 1 |
Elite on/off differentials often occur when great players have significant dropoffs in backup quality.
Lineup Analysis
The Five Best Lineups (Min 100 minutes)
| Lineup | Minutes | Net Rtg | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
| Giannis-Middleton-Lopez-Bledsoe-DiVincenzo | 245 | +18.2 | Primary starters |
| Giannis-Middleton-Lopez-Bledsoe-Matthews | 189 | +16.8 | Alternative starter |
| Giannis-Middleton-Lopez-Matthews-DiVincenzo | 124 | +14.5 | Bledsoe rest |
| Giannis-Connaughton-Lopez-Hill-Korver | 118 | +12.8 | Transition lineup |
| Giannis-Hill-Lopez-Bledsoe-DiVincenzo | 102 | +10.4 | Middleton rest |
Pattern: All top lineups included Giannis. The common thread was his presence, not specific combinations.
Lineups Without Giannis
| Lineup | Minutes | Net Rtg | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
| Middleton-Connaughton-Lopez-Hill-Korver | 84 | +3.2 | Best non-Giannis |
| Various bench combinations | - | -2.1 avg | Struggled |
Without Giannis, even quality players like Middleton couldn't replicate the team's dominant net rating.
Defensive Impact Analysis
Giannis's Defensive On/Off
The defensive transformation with Giannis on court was remarkable:
| Defensive Metric | Giannis On | Giannis Off | Differential |
|---|---|---|---|
| DRtg | 99.4 | 107.3 | -7.9 |
| Opp FG% | 42.8% | 45.6% | -2.8% |
| Opp 3P% | 34.2% | 36.8% | -2.6% |
| Opp At-Rim FG% | 58.4% | 64.2% | -5.8% |
The Brook Lopez Factor
An interesting secondary analysis:
| Split | DRtg | Net Rtg |
|---|---|---|
| Giannis + Lopez | 98.2 | +17.4 |
| Giannis without Lopez | 103.8 | +11.2 |
| Lopez without Giannis | 105.1 | +2.8 |
| Neither | 109.4 | -1.8 |
The Giannis-Lopez defensive combination was particularly devastating, with complementary skill sets (Lopez's rim protection + Giannis's roaming/help defense).
The Playoff Collapse: What On/Off Revealed
Regular Season vs. Playoffs
| Metric | Regular Season | Playoffs | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Team Net Rtg | +10.7 | +2.1 | -8.6 |
| Giannis On | +15.8 | +7.2 | -8.6 |
| Giannis Off | +0.5 | -5.8 | -6.3 |
What Happened?
The Miami Heat exploited specific Bucks patterns:
- Wall defense on Giannis: Sagged defenders into paint
- Forced jump shooting: Giannis's weakness exposed
- Exploited predictability: Drop coverage countered
On/Off in Series Loss
| Game | Giannis On Net Rtg | Team Result |
|---|---|---|
| Game 1 | +8.4 | Lost |
| Game 2 | +5.2 | Lost |
| Game 3 | +12.1 | Won |
| Game 4 | +3.8 | Won |
| Game 5 | -2.4 | Lost |
Game 5's negative on-court net rating was the anomaly - the only time all season Giannis was net negative.
Sample Size Considerations
Regular Season Reliability
| Player | Minutes | Net Rtg | Standard Error (est.) | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Giannis | 2,142 | +15.8 | ~4.0 | +7.8 to +23.8 |
| Middleton | 2,120 | +8.4 | ~4.1 | +0.2 to +16.6 |
| Lopez | 1,840 | +9.2 | ~4.4 | +0.4 to +18.0 |
Even with 2,000+ minutes, confidence intervals span 16+ points.
Playoff Volatility
| Series | Games | Minutes | Why Problematic |
|---|---|---|---|
| Heat Series | 5 | ~170 | Tiny sample |
| Single elimination | 1 | ~36 | Meaningless for individual |
The playoff sample (5 games, ~170 minutes) was insufficient to draw reliable on/off conclusions.
Analytical Lessons
Lesson 1: Team Net Rating Predicts Well, Not Perfectly
The Bucks' +10.7 Net Rating suggested championship-caliber performance. However: - Playoff adjustments can neutralize regular-season advantages - Sample size shrinks dramatically in playoffs - Opponent quality increases substantially
Lesson 2: On/Off Differential Captures Impact but Not Causation
Giannis's +15.3 differential demonstrated he was enormously valuable, but didn't explain: - Why he was valuable - Whether the value was sustainable against adjustments - How opponents might counter
Lesson 3: The Backup Quality Effect
Much of Giannis's huge on/off came from weak bench performance: - His on-court rating (+15.8) was excellent - The off-court rating (+0.5) was only okay - A better backup would reduce differential while improving team ceiling
Lesson 4: Two-Way Impact Shows in On/Off
Giannis's defensive impact (-7.9 DRtg differential) exceeded his offensive impact (+7.4 ORtg differential), revealing: - He was primarily a defensive catalyst - Traditional box scores (points, rebounds) understated defensive value - Net Rating captured what PER missed
Lesson 5: Playoff Sample Sizes Are Insufficient
With only 4-5 games per series, on/off statistics become nearly meaningless for individual evaluation: - Variance dominates signal - Single bad performances drastically affect numbers - Conclusions should rely on larger regular-season samples
What Metrics Couldn't Predict
The Bucks' playoff failure revealed limitations of regular-season on/off analysis:
- Playoff-specific adjustments: Miami's wall defense didn't exist in regular season data
- Skill-specific exploitation: Giannis's jump shooting could be targeted
- Coaching counter-strategies: Regular season nets don't reflect focused game-planning
- Sample size issues: Regular season variance masked vulnerability
Conclusions
The 2019-20 Milwaukee Bucks provide an excellent case study for plus-minus and on/off analysis:
-
Team Net Rating accurately captured the Bucks' regular-season dominance (+10.7 was historically elite)
-
Giannis's on/off differential (+15.3) properly identified him as the team's primary driver of success
-
Lineup analysis revealed that Giannis's presence, not specific combinations, drove winning
-
Defensive metrics showed Giannis's two-way impact better than box score statistics
-
Playoff results exposed limitations - adjustments and small samples made regular-season metrics less predictive
The Bucks' case demonstrates both the power and limitations of plus-minus analysis: excellent for identifying value over large samples, insufficient for predicting playoff success where opponents can implement targeted counter-strategies.
Discussion Questions
-
Should regular-season Net Rating be discounted when projecting playoff success? By how much?
-
How could on/off analysis be modified to identify players vulnerable to playoff adjustments?
-
Does Giannis's huge on/off differential indicate elite individual play, poor backup quality, or both?
-
What additional metrics would have predicted the Bucks' playoff vulnerability?
-
How should teams value regular-season dominance versus playoff versatility?
Data Sources
- NBA.com official statistics
- Basketball-Reference.com
- Cleaning the Glass
- PBP Stats
- ESPN Stats & Information