Chapter 16 Quiz: Diagnosing the Real Problem
Instructions: Answer all 20 questions. For multiple-choice questions, select the best answer. For short-answer questions, write 2-4 sentences. Answers are hidden — check each one after answering.
Question 1 Which of the following best describes the relationship between a "presenting problem" and a "real problem" in conflict diagnosis?
A. They are the same thing described from two perspectives. B. The presenting problem is a visible, surface-level trigger; the real problem is the underlying pattern or unmet need. C. The presenting problem is always more important because it just happened. D. The real problem can only be identified after the conversation takes place.
Show Answer
**B.** The presenting problem is the specific incident or behavior that triggered the conversation. The real problem is the pattern beneath the trigger and the underlying need or structural issue that the presenting problem is a symptom of. They are distinct, and conflating them is one of the most common reasons difficult conversations fail to produce durable outcomes.Question 2 The six steps of the Conflict Diagnosis Framework are listed below in scrambled order. Put them in the correct sequence by numbering them 1–6.
___ Identify your need ___ Map the pattern ___ Define what a "good outcome" would look like ___ Identify what you imagine their need is ___ Describe the incident (observable, behavioral, neutral) ___ Identify the trigger
Show Answer
1. Describe the incident (observable, behavioral, neutral) 2. Identify the trigger 3. Map the pattern 4. Identify your need 5. Identify what you imagine their need is 6. Define what a "good outcome" would look likeQuestion 3 According to Ury, Brett, and Goldberg, which approach to conflict resolution produces the most durable outcomes at the lowest cost?
A. Power-based resolution B. Rights-based resolution C. Interest-based resolution D. All three approaches produce equally durable outcomes
Show Answer
**C.** Ury, Brett, and Goldberg's research, which included a longitudinal study of coal mining disputes, found that interest-based resolution — collaborative problem-solving aimed at satisfying the underlying needs of both parties — produces the most durable outcomes at the lowest cost. Rights and power-based approaches are more expensive, produce less durable resolutions, and cause greater relationship damage.Question 4 True or False: A "contribution" to a conflict, as defined by Stone, Patton, and Heen, is the same as being at fault for it.
Show Answer
**False.** Stone, Patton, and Heen draw a careful distinction between contribution and fault. Fault is backward-looking, blame-assigning, and evaluative. Contribution is forward-looking, systems-oriented, and diagnostic — focused on understanding how both parties jointly created the conditions for the conflict, without necessarily attributing blame. Recognizing your contribution does not mean accepting responsibility for everything, nor does it relieve the other party of theirs.Question 5 Sam Nguyen notices that Tyler's missed deadlines are clustered at the beginning of new project cycles. What does this pattern reveal, and how should it change Sam's diagnostic framing?
Show Answer
The clustering pattern suggests the problem is contextual, not characterological. It is not that Tyler is generally careless — it is that something about the beginning of project cycles specifically creates difficulty for him. The most likely explanation is ambiguity about expectations and priorities during project setup. This shifts Sam's diagnostic framing from a rights-based enforcement problem (Tyler is violating accountability expectations) to an interests-based problem (Tyler needs clearer expectations and support at project initiation, and Sam may have contributed to conditions of ambiguity).Question 6 Which of the following is an example of a "behavioral, observable, neutral" description of a conflict incident — as required by Step 1 of the Conflict Diagnosis Framework?
A. "She was dismissive and clearly didn't care about the meeting." B. "He always undermines me in front of the team." C. "During the Wednesday staff meeting, Renata spoke over me twice without acknowledgment and then presented the project update as though my contributions had not occurred." D. "The presentation was a disaster and she knew exactly what she was doing."
Show Answer
**C.** This is the only option that describes specific, observable behaviors (speaking over, presenting without acknowledgment) in a neutral frame. Options A, B, and D contain character assessments ("dismissive," "always undermines"), attributions of intent ("knew exactly what she was doing"), and evaluative labels ("disaster") — none of which constitute observable behavioral descriptions.Question 7 Short Answer: Explain the difference between a position and an interest. Give an original example of each in a workplace conflict.
Show Answer
A position is what someone is asking for — a specific outcome or demand. An interest is the underlying reason they want it — the need, concern, or value that the position is meant to satisfy. Positions are often fixed and appear incompatible; interests are frequently more flexible and may allow for multiple satisfying solutions. *Example:* A position is "I want my own office, not an open-plan desk." An interest might be "I need a quiet environment to concentrate on complex analysis, and I need privacy for client calls." The position demands a specific physical arrangement; the interest opens up other possibilities — noise-canceling headphones and a designated call room might satisfy the interest without requiring a private office.Question 8 According to the chapter, why is it important to generate a hypothesis about the other person's need in Step 5 of the Conflict Diagnosis Framework — even before the conversation has happened?
A. So you can predict what they will say and prepare counter-arguments B. To prevent entering the conversation treating the other person as simply an obstacle, and to prepare you to listen accurately C. Because your hypothesis will almost certainly be correct D. To identify which approach — interests, rights, or power — you should use
Show Answer
**B.** The purpose of generating a charitable hypothesis about the other person's need is twofold: it prevents you from entering the conversation treating them solely as a problem to be managed, and it prepares you to listen with a framework — a hypothesis to test rather than arriving completely blank. The chapter is explicit that this is a hypothesis, not a verdict, and that the conversation itself will test and likely refine it.Question 9 True or False: A rights-based approach to conflict resolution is always inappropriate if an interest-based approach is possible.
Show Answer
**False.** While the chapter recommends exhausting interest-based approaches before escalating, rights-based approaches are sometimes appropriate and necessary — for instance, when a genuine agreement or contract has been violated, when interest-based resolution has been attempted and failed, or when a power imbalance is so severe that only an external standard creates safety for the lower-power party. The framework is not hierarchical in a way that prohibits rights-based approaches; it recommends matching the approach to the actual level and condition of the conflict.Question 10 Jade Flores and her mother argue repeatedly about trust and independence. The chapter diagnoses the real problem as "a relationship that has never been renegotiated as Jade became an adult." Which step of the Conflict Diagnosis Framework does this diagnosis primarily result from?
A. Step 1 — Describe the incident B. Step 2 — Identify the trigger C. Step 3 — Map the pattern D. Step 6 — Define the good outcome
Show Answer
**C.** The diagnosis emerges from Step 3 — mapping the pattern across multiple incidents. When Jade (or the reader) examines not just the most recent argument but all the recurring arguments — about her new friends, about missed texts, about New Year's Eve — the common theme of a relationship that has not been renegotiated emerges. Individual incidents read as disagreements about specific rules; the pattern reveals a structural issue about the relationship itself.Question 11 The chapter introduces the "clean hands" question: Am I approaching this conversation honestly? This question is best understood as asking whether:
A. You have never done anything wrong in the relationship B. You have legal or factual justification for the confrontation C. You are willing to see the full picture — including your own contribution — rather than approaching as a purely wronged party D. You have documented the other person's behavior adequately
Show Answer
**C.** The "clean hands" question is not about innocence or perfect behavior — no one qualifies on those terms. It is about intellectual honesty: the willingness to do a full diagnosis that includes your own contribution, rather than approaching the conversation exclusively from the position of wronged party. Priya's clean hands question led her to acknowledge that she had never given Vasquez the documentation standards or conducted the onboarding check-in — not to abandon the conversation, but to arrive at it with a complete picture.Question 12 Short Answer: Name three "common forms of contribution" to conflict that the chapter identifies. Briefly explain each.
Show Answer
1. **Creating the conditions for problematic behavior.** Contributing to a context — through rushed onboarding, unclear communication, poor systems — in which the other person's problematic behavior becomes more likely. Sam's failure to communicate expectations clearly at project initiation is an example. 2. **Rewarding the very behavior you are now confronting.** Implicitly signaling that problematic behavior was acceptable — by absorbing consequences, praising other aspects of performance without addressing the problem, or allowing the behavior to continue unchallenged — and then confronting the same behavior later. Priya's eight months of silence about Vasquez's documentation is an example. 3. **Not setting expectations clearly.** The most common form: the expectation existed in your mind but was never explicitly communicated. You assumed "everyone knows." The other person worked from different assumptions.Question 13 Which of the following best illustrates a power-based approach to conflict resolution?
A. Asking a mediator to determine who is right based on industry standards B. Presenting the other party with documented evidence of the pattern C. Going on strike to force management to return to the bargaining table D. Asking the other party what they need in order to change their behavior
Show Answer
**C.** A strike is a classic power move — the use of collective action to impose costs on management and force a change in behavior or position. Option A describes rights-based (adjudication by a standard). Option B is a form of rights framing (presenting evidence of a violation). Option D is the paradigmatic interests-based approach.Question 14 Marcus Chen recognizes that working excessive hours is a symptom. After completing Step 4 of the Conflict Diagnosis Framework, his underlying need is described in the chapter as: "to be seen as professionally competent without sacrificing himself to prove it." What does this identification of the need reveal about what kind of conversation Marcus actually needs to have?
Show Answer
It reveals that Marcus does not primarily need a conversation about overtime hours — he needs a conversation about professional identity and boundaries. The hours are a symptom of a deeper issue: he has not established, with himself or his supervisors, what professional competence looks like without self-sacrifice. The conversation he needs may include discussing sustainable expectations with supervisors, but it probably also involves an internal renegotiation of what it means to perform well without exhausting himself. The diagnostic work reveals that limiting hours alone would be a partial solution that does not address the underlying need.Question 15 True or False: Stakeholder mapping should only include people who are directly involved in the conflict.
Show Answer
**False.** Stakeholder mapping explicitly includes *secondary* stakeholders — people who are not directly involved but whose interests will be meaningfully affected by how the conflict is resolved. In Sam's case, his entire team are secondary stakeholders who have been absorbing the consequences of Tyler's late deliverables and who are watching how Sam handles the situation, drawing conclusions about team norms. Omitting secondary stakeholders produces an incomplete picture of the system the conflict is embedded in.Question 16 Short Answer: What is the diagnostic question associated with each of the three levels — interests, rights, and power — in the Ury/Brett/Goldberg framework?
Show Answer
**Interests:** "What does each party actually need here, and why?" The interests question focuses on underlying needs, goals, concerns, and values — the why beneath the what. **Rights:** "Is there a standard — contractual, legal, professional, or normative — that both parties already acknowledge?" The rights question asks whether an external, mutually recognized standard applies to the situation. **Power:** "Is coercion necessary here, or am I reaching for it because it feels faster or more satisfying?" The power question requires honesty about whether the situation genuinely calls for unilateral action or whether the impulse to use power is a substitute for harder problem-solving.Question 17 Dr. Priya Okafor's diagnostic process reveals that she never provided Vasquez with a documentation standards guide and never conducted a 30-day onboarding check-in. How does this discovery change the conversation she is about to have — not whether she has it, but how she approaches it?
A. She should cancel the conversation entirely because she bears responsibility for the problem. B. She should not mention her contribution in the conversation, to avoid undermining her authority. C. She can acknowledge her contribution to the situation while still clearly addressing the documentation problem — arriving with a complete diagnosis rather than a partial one. D. She should transfer Vasquez to a different supervisor.
Show Answer
**C.** The diagnostic discovery does not eliminate the need for the conversation — Vasquez's documentation is genuinely deficient and the pattern needs to change. What changes is how Priya enters the conversation: rather than arriving purely as the wronged supervisor confronting a negligent employee, she arrives with an honest, complete diagnosis that includes her contribution. This allows her to address the problem clearly, take accountability for her part without abandoning her responsibility to address his, and build a more realistic foundation for genuine resolution.Question 18 The chapter warns that "the most seductive move in a difficult situation is to escalate to rights or power when interests-level conversation feels hard or uncertain." Why is this escalation seductive, and what does it typically cost?
Show Answer
It is seductive because it feels like decisive action. Filing a complaint, threatening to leave, invoking formal procedures — these feel like doing something, moving toward resolution, asserting oneself. They bypass the ambiguity and discomfort of interests-level conversation, which requires listening, negotiating, and tolerating uncertainty. The cost is typically high: rights and power approaches damage relationships, produce adversarial rather than collaborative dynamics, often leave underlying interests unaddressed, generate resentment and resistance, and are more costly in time, money, and emotional capital. Because they do not address the underlying needs, they frequently produce ongoing conflict in new forms.Question 19 When mapping the pattern (Step 3), the chapter recommends "naming the pattern." Which of the following best explains why naming the pattern is useful?
A. It allows you to use the name to shame the other person in the conversation. B. It helps you think about the pattern as a structural issue rather than a personal attack, and communicate about it more precisely. C. A named pattern is admissible as evidence in HR proceedings. D. It proves the behavior has been intentional.
Show Answer
**B.** Naming the pattern serves cognitive and communicative purposes: it helps you see the problem as structural and systemic rather than as a personal offense, which reduces emotional reactivity and increases diagnostic accuracy. It also gives you a precise way to refer to the issue in the conversation — rather than "you always do this kind of thing," you can say something like "what I notice is a pattern around the beginning of project cycles." Precision in naming produces precision in conversation.Question 20 Short Answer: The chapter closes with a description of what accurate, honest diagnosis makes possible. In your own words, summarize what that is. What does arriving with a complete diagnosis — rather than a partial one — actually change about the conversation ahead?