Chapter 18 Exercises: Structuring Your Opening — How to Start Difficult Conversations
Section 18.1 — Why Openings Are Everything
Exercise 18.1 [Conceptual] ★ Explain the primacy effect in your own words. How does it apply to the opening of a difficult conversation? Give a specific example of how a negative primacy effect could unfold — what would the listener experience in the first thirty seconds, and how might that affect their reception of subsequent content?
Exercise 18.2 [Conceptual] ★★ The chapter identifies five types of bad openings: the apology-forward opening, the buried lead, the accusation opening, the rhetorical question opener, and the vague distress signal. For each type: a) Write one example of that opening (for any confrontation context you choose) b) Identify specifically what message the other party receives from that opening c) Explain how that message affects the conversational trajectory
Exercise 18.3 [Scenario] ★★ Read the following opening and evaluate it:
"Hey, Tariq — sorry to bother you. Um, I don't know if it's a big deal, but I've kind of been noticing that like, the dishes situation has been, I don't know, a little bit challenging for me, and I feel bad saying anything because I know you're really busy with school, but I guess I just wanted to kind of mention it because I've been feeling a little frustrated, but obviously you don't have to change anything if it doesn't work for you."
Identify: (a) which failure type(s) this exemplifies, (b) what the listener hears, and (c) what this opening communicates about the speaker's belief in their own concern.
Exercise 18.4 [Applied] ★★ Think of a difficult conversation you are avoiding or have recently had. Write a brief (one paragraph) analysis of how the opening went — or how you imagine it would go if you started it the way you typically start difficult conversations. What failure pattern are you most prone to? Where does it come from?
Exercise 18.5 [Conceptual] ★★ The chapter claims that people decide "Is this a conversation I can participate in honestly?" within the first thirty seconds. Do you agree? What specific features of a conversation opening might cause someone to decide "no"? What features might cause someone to decide "yes"?
Section 18.2 — The Three-Part Opening Framework
Exercise 18.6 [Conceptual] ★ For each of the three parts of the Three-Part Opening Framework, write: (a) its purpose, (b) one example of doing it well, and (c) one common mistake people make in that part.
Exercise 18.7 [Scenario] ★★ Sam needs to address his boss Marcus Webb about consistently being excluded from planning meetings for a new initiative, despite being the operations lead.
Write a complete Three-Part Opening for Sam's conversation with Webb. Label each part explicitly. Then write a brief analysis explaining why you made the specific choices you made.
Exercise 18.8 [Applied] ★★ Using the Three-Part Opening Framework, write a complete opening for a real difficult conversation you need to have (or have recently needed to have). Label each part. Then evaluate your own draft: Is the intent statement specific enough to be credible? Is the factual description behavioral and observable? Is the invitation genuine?
Exercise 18.9 [Scenario] ★★ The following is a Three-Part Opening Framework attempt by Jade addressing her mother Rosa about career pressure:
"Mom — I love you and I care about our relationship (Part 1). I've noticed that every time we talk about school, you seem really focused on me going into nursing, and I haven't felt like I could talk about other options (Part 2). I'd really like to understand why nursing matters so much to you (Part 3)."
Evaluate this opening. What does it do well? What might be improved? Rewrite it if you think it needs adjustment, and explain your changes.
Exercise 18.10 [Synthesis] ★★★ The Three-Part Opening Framework can feel formulaic when applied mechanically. Write a two-page reflection on how to use a framework like this without sounding scripted. What makes the difference between a framework that sounds genuine and one that sounds robotic? What is the relationship between preparation and authenticity in confrontation?
Section 18.3 — Scripts for Common Opening Situations
Exercise 18.11 [Applied] ★★ Select three of the ten opening scripts from section 18.3 that most closely match situations in your own life. For each: a) Adapt the script to your specific situation (change names, relationship, context) b) Identify what you would keep from the original and what you would change c) Write a brief explanation of why these adaptations serve your specific relationship dynamic
Exercise 18.12 [Scenario] ★★ Dr. Priya Okafor needs to address a situation in which Dr. Vasquez, her direct report, has begun directly communicating with Dr. Harmon (Priya's boss) without going through her — bypassing her in the chain of command.
This is different from Script 3 in the chapter (documentation failures). Write a complete Three-Part Opening for Priya that addresses the specific dynamic of chain-of-command bypass. Explain what makes this situation particularly delicate and how your opening manages those dynamics.
Exercise 18.13 [Scenario] ★★★ You are confronting someone you are genuinely angry at — not mildly annoyed, but significantly hurt and frustrated. You have been waiting three weeks to have this conversation, and that waiting has not reduced your anger.
Write TWO versions of your opening: - Version A: An opening that honestly reflects your emotional state - Version B: An opening that uses the Three-Part Framework to manage the expression of your anger
Then analyze both: Which is more honest? Which is more likely to achieve a productive outcome? Is there a way to preserve the honesty of Version A within the structure of Version B?
Exercise 18.14 [Applied] ★★ Write a Three-Part Opening for a confrontation involving a power differential in which you are the one with less power. Then write a brief reflection on what makes this harder than peer-to-peer confrontations. What specific adaptations does the Three-Part Framework require when the power differential is significant?
Exercise 18.15 [Synthesis] ★★★ The chapter's scripts are all written from the perspective of the person initiating the confrontation. Write a brief guide from the perspective of the person RECEIVING the conversation — what should they listen for, what should they do in the first thirty seconds, and how should they respond to a well-structured opening? What does the Three-Part Framework look like from the receiving end?
Section 18.4 — Managing the First Thirty Seconds
Exercise 18.16 [Conceptual] ★ Describe the physiological and behavioral interventions the chapter recommends for managing the first thirty seconds. For each, explain the mechanism: why does this intervention work?
Exercise 18.17 [Applied] ★★ Identify your personal pattern of physical anxiety symptoms during difficult conversations (e.g., speaking faster, losing eye contact, voice changes, fumbling with hands). For each symptom you identify, describe one concrete management strategy you could practice.
Exercise 18.18 [Scenario] ★★ Marcus is about to knock on Diane's office door for the Wednesday 2pm meeting he scheduled. He is standing in the hallway, heart racing, with a version of his opening memorized. He has forty-five seconds before he knocks.
Write a step-by-step description of what Marcus should do in those forty-five seconds — both internally (what he thinks) and externally (what he does physically). Be specific about breath, posture, and what he says to himself.
Exercise 18.19 [Applied] ★★★ Record yourself (audio or video) delivering the opening you wrote for Exercise 18.8. Watch or listen to it. Evaluate: pace, eye contact (if video), breathing, any excessive apologies, whether you buried the lead. Write a self-evaluation paragraph and a revised delivery plan.
Exercise 18.20 [Conceptual] ★★ The chapter describes the "opening pause" — the silence after you complete your Three-Part Opening. Why is this pause important? Why is it difficult? What is the risk of filling the silence? Design a brief self-coaching protocol for managing the pause.
Section 18.5 — When Your Opening Gets Derailed
Exercise 18.21 [Scenario] ★★ Sam delivers a careful, structured opening to Marcus Webb about the workload situation. Webb responds with visible irritation: "I'm honestly a little surprised you're bringing this up. I thought we dealt with this last quarter. I've got a lot of competing priorities right now."
Identify what type of derailment this is (anger, deflection, counter-confrontation, or combination). Write Sam's response word-for-word. Then explain the strategy behind each sentence of his response.
Exercise 18.22 [Scenario] ★★ Jade delivers her opening to her mother Rosa about career pressure. Rosa's eyes immediately fill with tears and she says, "After everything I've done for you — is that really how you see me?"
Write Jade's response to this moment. Your response should: acknowledge Rosa's emotion, not retract the concern, and hold the door open for the conversation to continue. Write a brief analysis of why this derailment is particularly difficult and what makes your response effective.
Exercise 18.23 [Scenario] ★★★ Dr. Priya delivers her opening to Dr. Vasquez. He responds: "Before we get into that — I've actually been wanting to raise a concern about how you've been managing our team's access to leadership. I think there's a real issue there that we need to address first."
This is a counter-confrontation. Write Priya's response. What is she trying to accomplish? What are the risks of engaging with his concern now? What are the risks of declining? How does she hold both concerns without either dismissing his or losing her own?
Exercise 18.24 [Applied] ★★ Think of a time when your opening in a difficult conversation was derailed — by anger, tears, deflection, or dismissal. Using the Opening Recovery Playbook from the chapter, write a retrospective analysis: What type of derailment occurred? What did you do at the time? What would you do differently using the chapter's framework?
Exercise 18.25 [Synthesis] ★★★ Design a self-coaching practice for developing opening fluency. Your practice should include: (a) how you identify conversations that need the Three-Part Framework, (b) how you draft and review the opening, (c) how you practice delivery before the actual conversation, (d) how you review and learn from each attempt, and (e) how you know when you are getting better. Make it specific and realistic enough that you would actually use it over the next three months.