Key Takeaways: Home Field Advantage
One-page reference for Chapter 15 concepts
HFA Measurement Methods
# Win percentage method
home_win_pct = home_wins / total_games
# Point margin method
hfa_points = avg_home_score - avg_away_score
# Spread method (market-implied)
implied_hfa = -avg_spread_line # ~2.5-3.0 points historically
Historical HFA Values
| Era |
Home Win % |
Implied Points |
| 2000-2010 |
57-58% |
~3.0 |
| 2011-2019 |
54-57% |
~2.5-3.0 |
| 2020 (COVID) |
50-51% |
~0.5-1.0 |
| 2021-2023 |
52-54% |
~2.0-2.5 |
HFA Trend
# Declining over time
# Historical: ~3.0 points
# Current: ~2.0-2.5 points
# COVID impact showed crowd = major factor
# 2020 home win % ≈ 50% (no crowds)
Causal Factors
| Factor |
Impact |
Evidence |
| Crowd Noise |
High |
False start differential |
| Travel |
Medium |
West coast teams worse traveling east |
| Time Zones |
Low-Medium |
Early games after timezone change |
| Referee Bias |
Low |
Slightly more away penalties |
| Familiarity |
Low |
Knowing venue, climate |
Team-Specific HFA
| Team |
Factors |
HFA |
| SEA |
Noise, weather |
High (~3.5 pts) |
| KC |
Arrowhead noise |
High (~3.5 pts) |
| DEN |
Altitude (5,280 ft) |
High (~3.0 pts) |
| GB |
Cold, Lambeau |
Above Avg (~3.0 pts) |
| NO |
Dome noise |
Above Avg (~3.0 pts) |
Penalty Differentials
# False starts (crowd noise effect)
away_false_starts > home_false_starts # ~15-20% more
# Delay of game (communication issues)
away_delays > home_delays # Similar pattern
Travel Effects
| Distance |
Away Win % Impact |
| < 500 mi |
Minimal |
| 500-1000 mi |
Slight decrease |
| 1000-2000 mi |
Small decrease |
| > 2000 mi |
Noticeable (~2-3%) |
Timezone Effects
# West to East travel (worst)
away_win_pct ≈ 43-45%
# East to West travel (better)
away_win_pct ≈ 46-48%
# Same timezone
away_win_pct ≈ 47-48%
Using HFA in Predictions
# Basic prediction
predicted_spread = (home_rating - away_rating) + hfa
# Team-specific
predicted_spread = neutral_spread + get_team_hfa(home_team)
# Default HFA values
standard_hfa = 2.5 # Modern NFL
team_specific_range = 1.5 to 3.5 # Varies by venue
Model Integration
# Power rating approach
expected_margin = home_power - away_power + hfa
# Win probability
home_win_prob = sigmoid(expected_margin / 13.5)
# Example
# KC (rating +4) hosts LV (rating -2)
# HFA = 3.0 (Arrowhead)
# Predicted: KC by 9.0 points
Key Correlations
| Relationship |
Finding |
| HFA vs Wins |
r ≈ 0.15-0.20 (small) |
| Crowd Size vs HFA |
Positive (COVID evidence) |
| Altitude vs HFA |
Positive (Denver effect) |
| Travel Distance vs Away Performance |
Negative (small) |
Practical Applications
| Use Case |
HFA Approach |
| Spread prediction |
Add 2.0-2.5 points |
| Power rankings |
Neutral-site adjustments |
| Playoff seeding value |
Home = 2-3 point swing |
| Model building |
Include as fixed parameter |
Key Insights
- HFA has declined from ~3 to ~2-2.5 points
- Crowd support is primary driver (COVID evidence)
- Team-specific values improve predictions
- Travel/timezone effects are small but real
- Playoff home field still valuable (~2-3 pts per round)
Preview: Chapter 16
Next: Strength of Schedule - measuring and adjusting for opponent quality.